Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need: sound bytes, bullet items, hard facts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 02:53 PM
Original message
We need: sound bytes, bullet items, hard facts
it occurs to me that when making the argument about election fraud, it often gets complicated. to make an impression on newbies, we need to have some very simple facts that can be stated in a bulleted list, which unfortunately is what people are used to nowadays.

I came up with a couple.

"A handful of programmers at Diebold headquarters could rig the election results and no one would ever know because there are no checks and balances in the system."

"Because voting machine software is 'proprietary,' no one is allowed to view the source code, which means our votes are being counted in secret."


if we had a 6-10 compelling items for a bulleted list, we could distribute it widely and try to get some more people interested and active in the subject.

got any more quick, simple, factual, eyebrow-raising items for the bulleted list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great idea to do this, even better idea to vet it here and elsewhere first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Okey DOkey
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 05:39 PM by FogerRox
-WIth a lever machine the vote counting mechanism can be examined, with computerized voting no-one can look at the vote counting mechanism except a corporate agent.

- A DRE issues a printed tally and a smart card tally. Vendors laud the redundancy, like having 2 sets of books. But if you had an accountant caught with 2 sets of books, you would call the police.

-Papers filed with the SEC on November 3rd, 2004 indicate that Wally Odell of Diebold recieved about 34 million in stock options. Heck of a job WAlly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sound bites have a place but documentation is also needed
Kerry won Ohio & the national total in 2004
http://www.flcv.com/ohiosum.html

Most states had touch screen switching, systematic dirty tricks, and other systematic manipulation of the election in 2004
http://www.flcv.com/summary.html
http://www.flcv.com/ussumall.html

Florida had the most touch screen switching and largest swing in 2004 election
http://www.flcv.com/fla04EAS.html
http://www.flcv.com/fraudpat.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. i agree, that's what footnotes are for...
bullets without documentation is decaffinated coffee !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think this is a great Idea, ( kick- n- recommended ).
Lets get some dumbed down points that everyone can understand.

Have you ever asked how your votes get counted?

Did you know they won't show you how your vote got counted?

You should be asking WHY? They won't show you how your vote got counted. Type stuff, just a thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Faulty ballot definition programming could accidentally or deliberately
change the outcome of an election even before the first vote is cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truckin Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. When electronic voting machines are used local poll workers do
not count the votes, the voting machine companies do.

And if their eyes haven't turned glassy yet, you can add that some of the programmers at one of the biggest voting machine companies are convicted felons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I like that one..
Keep it simple.............. great soundbite.!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. The recent GAO report on electronic voting says:
"Numerous recent studies and reports have highlighted problems with the security and reliability of electronic voting systems. While these reports often focused on problems with specific systems or jurisdictions, the concerns they raise have the potential to affect election outcomes."

http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/abstract.php?rptno=GAO-05-956
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. "The secret ballot" wasn't meant to be secret from the voter
and

A paper printout from an electronic machine tells you who you voted for, which could be the *opposite* of how your vote was counted by the computer. Even a recount does not reveal "flipped" votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Highly partisan private corp. counts DRE results. Recount/audit impossible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Even our election officials and secretaries of state cannot view the
source code for the software that counts nearly 100% of votes in the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Nearly all U.S. votes are counted on trade secret software programmed
by private corporations with partisan political and financial conflicts of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Jeff Dean, who wrote the source code for Diebold software, has
been convicted of 23 felony counts of theft in the first degree for building back doors into software for purposes of embezzlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC