Mark Crispin Miller's Reply to Salon >

Posted in GD:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5432845

you need to watch an advertisement or else have a subscription to get in, I believe.

I was able to read the letter without watching an ad, for some reason.

put to bed. Thanks for posting it.

and hand them the remote

I have been a wee bit stressed with Mr. Right Foot in a cast, Doug in a meds change (how do you spell "potentially catastrophic"?) and blah blah blah.

Liquor is very efficient. Limping off to the store NOW!

Steph.

:loveya:

on edit, fixed link

In March 2005 Teresa Heinz Kerry was in Seattle for an event and was quoted as being "openly skeptical" about the election result at a fundraiser in Seattle

<http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/connelly/214744_joel07.html?searchpagefrom=1&searchdiff=261>

The election part starts 10-12 paragraphs down and says in part (four paragraphs only):

COUNTING THE VOTES: Heinz Kerry is openly skeptical about results from November's election, particularly in sections of the country where optical scanners were used to record votes.

"Two brothers own 80 percent of the machines used in the United States," Heinz Kerry said. She identified both as "hard-right" Republicans. She argued that it is "very easy to hack into the mother machines."

"We in the United States are not a banana republic," added Heinz Kerry. She argued that Democrats should insist on "accountability and transparency" in how votes are tabulated.

"I fear for '06," she said. "I don't trust it the way it is right now."