Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold's Letter To Pennsylvania: A Rebuttal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 04:18 PM
Original message
Diebold's Letter To Pennsylvania: A Rebuttal


Diebold's Letter To Pennsylvania: A Rebuttal

By Roxanne Jekot, CountTheVote.org

January 21, 2006

On January 3, 2006, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pedro Cortes and his consultant Dr. Michael Shamos submitted a series of questions to Diebold Elections Systems regarding the AccuBasic (which Diebold also calls ABasic) reporting scripts used by their AccuVote TSX touchscreen voting system. Diebold responded in a letter dated January 5, 2006. While Diebold's answers in this letter apparently met with "the statisfaction of the Secretary and his consultant", they are wholly unsatisfactory to the voters in Pennsylvania whose democracy is being entrusted to Diebold's equipment.

While failing to adequately answer Pennsylvania’s questions, Diebold did make some serious revelations. Specifically, while Hursti used old firmware (1.94w), Diebold confirms in Appendix A that their newly certified firmware (1.96) will behave with the same lapses in security. They confirmed that the Zero Total Report relies on the public counter variable and NOT database (ballot image) contents and that Diebold’s basic point of security is dependent on the Windows Operating System security. After years of scrutiny and published reports by computer security experts worldwide, Diebold has still failed to close the most basic security flaws in their source code.

snip

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=815&Itemid=113

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. why would they want to do away with their access points?
,er... i mean security flaws? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC