6th Cir. Case Holds P-card and Optical Scan unconstitutional!!!

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 11:51 AM
Original message

6th Cir. Case Holds P-card and Optical Scan unconstitutional!!!

here's a new thread in GP-politics if you could keep the discussion going while i take the kids out this sunday afternoon that would be sweet

<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2585602>

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message

1. ok, back from the "Y", thanks to everyone over there

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BeFree

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message

2. Did the kids have fun?

Might I suggest we hold off recommending this thread? We don't need two of the same threads on greatest. If we wait for the fifth rec, we can get the monday afternoon traffic to read it by putting it up on the greatest 24 hours from now.

I guess I am saying we might think about thread management from here on?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. kids got a good swim in

btw, as expressly stated in the GD-P post, PRECINCT Count optical scan is not challenged DIRECTLY in the Stewart v Blackwell holding. However, that doesn't mean that there aren't other cases that will using the princple of Bush v Gore, and it doesn't mean that there aren't other dynamics or legal principles that come to bear outside of this particular case.

It's good to be very very concerned about these legal developments. It's always bad to be hysterical or despondent. Nobody wants that, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BeFree

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. I am optimistic

As the news breaks and the facts come out, certain leaders are bound to begin squirming.

Is this not the first major voting case to wind it's way through to this point, with others close on the heels?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message

5. here are access number s for 5 pm EST SUnday

Dial-in Number: (641) 297-4600
Access code: 372008#
5 pm EST, 2 pm PST

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. thanks all, there's a bit of a wrap up post at #52 in the GP thread

think of HAVA compliance and Stewart V. Blackwell compliance (equal protection and Bush v Gore) as being separate animals but you gotta comply with both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Steve A Play

(638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message

6. Folks, please kick and recommend the OTHER THREAD

in GD Politics in stead of this one! Thank you! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Land Shark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-23-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6

8. thanks Steve A Play, please kick other thread, there's now post-

conf call discussion over there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.