Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court of Appeals rules that Ohio lawsuit will be put on hold.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 07:27 PM
Original message
Court of Appeals rules that Ohio lawsuit will be put on hold.
http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/15023/

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week that a critical lawsuit aimed at improving the security and integrity of Ohio's voting technology will be put on hold indefinitely. The ruling halts case proceedings until the appeal of the government's motion to dismiss is decided and seriously jeopardizes the chances that critical procedural improvements will be in place by the time voters enter polling places in November.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) had intervened in this lawsuit, originally brought by the League of Women Voters of Ohio, in the fall of 2005 on behalf of voter Jeanne White. White's case focuses on the issues surrounding electronic voting and seeks to increase the security and accuracy of Ohio's e-voting technology, as well as to dramatically improve state and local procedures that leave the integrity of the state's e-voting equipment in doubt.

Ohio's closely watched and widely criticized election of 2004 exposed a wide range of problems, complaints, and irregularities in its voting technologies. Among other things, voters reported unacceptably long lines, inadequately trained pollworkers, and voting machines that failed to record their votes correctly. Similar problems were reported in the 2005 elections and in the May 2, 2006, primary, including a chaotic election in Cuyahoga County where election officials have launched a formal investigation. Ohio, however, has no requirements that counties keep formal track of such problems, much less report them to state officials or to the public.

"We had hoped the appellate court would follow the trial court's lead and let the case progress," said EFF Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman "Without this expedited schedule, the case won't be able to marshal changes to Ohio's voting systems before this November's elections. The state owes it to its citizens to ensure that the problems of the past are identified and won't be repeated. It has, so far, failed to do so."

EFF intends to challenge the Sixth Circuit's recent ruling and to continue to move Ms. White's case forward as quickly as possible. EFF is working with the law firms of Kerger and Associates and Zuckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker as it pursues this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm very impressed with EFF.
They are one of the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They have been magnificent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who sits on the 6th circuit....
I hope EFF is successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sad news for Ohio. Sorry to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is the Sorry State of Ohio. Full of crooks and liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Seems true. Election after election.
And now a woman is sent off for "mental evaluation" because she posted an anti-dimson poster.

Outrageous. I hope Ohio will at least get to keep Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. This is why people are fleeing the state like it's on fire...
They've turned Ohio into a toxic shit-hole that no one wants to live in anymore. As soon as I can get out, I'm leaving too. Fuck this shitty state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I hadn't heard about a mass exodus, but it's understandable.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Was anyone actually surprised at this?
Did anyone think Blackwell and the rest of his crew would take this lying down?

The best we can do in the meantime, outside the court or smashing machines, would be to come into the polls with video and still cameras to monitor for irregularities. If the machine registers an incorrect vote, take a picture if you can. If the machine freezes or the line is huge, take a picture. Then, if you can, volunteer your pictures for investigation or media publication.

If we can't stop it, we can at least expose all of it and discredit the corrupt electoral process. Blackwell and his buddies may be "elected", but if no one believes it, will they be allowed to take office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. yes
documentation is so important.

Obviously although the legal system is one avenue, it's all too easy for corrupt individuals to work it to advantage. Different strategies are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. "put on hold" - WHY? What reasoning did the court give? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sorry, can't find the ruling yet, but I assume it will be on one of these
two sites in the next few days:
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/lwv05.php
http://www.eff.org/Activism/E-voting/ohio/interlocappeal_application_to_file.pdf

I just read through a status report produced by the plaintiffs and it is a very interesting narrative of happenings in the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC