Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NADER CALLS FOR RECOUNT - Link& article (2 hours ago)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:54 PM
Original message
NADER CALLS FOR RECOUNT - Link& article (2 hours ago)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20041111/pl_afp/us_vote_nader

Nader calls for US election recounts

2 hours, 34 minutes ago Politics - AFP



WASHINGTON (AFP) - Ralph Nader (news - web sites), an independent presidential candidate, has called for recounts of November 2 voting results, to ensure that every ballot was counted amid allegations of irregularities.

Nader, who this year drew about one percent of the vote nationally, said Wednesday he was speaking out for the "thousands" of US voters asking for recounts and not on his own behalf.


"Over 2,000 citizens, including voting rights advocates, are urging, in writing, the Nader Camejo campaign to help make sure every vote is counted and counted accurately. The Nader-Camejo campaign does not view the election to be over merely because concession speeches, which have no legal effect, have been given. Rather, they are over when every vote is counted and legally certified," Nader said.


He urged recounts particularly in the hotly disputed states of Ohio and Florida, which went to Bush, New Hampshire which went to Kerry, and North Carolina, which went to Bush.


"Striking inconsistencies exist between the vote as reported on the AccuVote Diebold Machines and exit polls and voting trends in New Hampshire. These irregularities in the reported vote count favor president George W. Bush by five to 15 percent over what was expected.


"Problems in these electronic voting machines and optical scanners are being reported in machines in a variety of states," Nader added.


However, Democrats said there was no need to challenge the outcome.


"Unlike 2000, the Republicans simply received more votes than Democrats in this election," said Democratic National Committee (news - web sites) Chairman Terry McAuliffe in a statement.


"We are not contesting the outcome of this election.


"But, win, lose or draw, the Democratic party feels that every vote is a voice, and to that end, we are committed to ensuring that every vote cast in 2004 be counted," he said.


Bev Harris, author of a book, "Black Box Voting," has for years questioned US voting procedures, including the 2004 vote, which she said was particularly questionable in Ohio, the state that tipped the scales toward Bush's victory.


She said she plans to take advantage of an Ohio law that allows a group of no less than five citizens to demand a recount.


Rumors of fraud have been circulating in this state, and news out of the region has added fuel to the fire. A computer error gave Bush 4,258 votes and 260 to Kerry -- although just 638 voters had cast ballots. The local election committee said later that the count was rectified.


Other states with disputed results, North Carolina, New Hampshire and Florida, once again questioned after being the cause of a 36-day delay in counting ballots in 2000.


Nader said he had already begun the procedure to demand a recount in New Hampshire, where Bush won an unexpected number of votes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GuardingVirginia Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. help me out here.....
help me out but how do you recount the e-vote machines? Don't you just run the counter again and if was wrong/right the first time it will be the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ohio is 70% punch cards.
Punch cards can be recounted.

Regarding e-vote machines, they can't really be re-counted, but they can be inspected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You can also do a comparison....
Do hand counted ballots match exit polls, but the e-vote machines differ dramatically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. DONATE -- Help fund the Recounts
Report Voting Problems:
FUNDING THE RECOUNTS -- See this before you donate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=201&topic_id=2617#2633
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. i hope no one has a problem with this
this is what you've been wanting. nader out front saying all the right things, will the democrats lay low and sound reasonable. works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. pbartch
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.




Thank you.

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC