Reconstructing The Crime

Massive irregularities in the November 2 presidential vote count “will probably lead to congressional hearings in the Committee on the Judiciary,” predicts Rep. John Conyers, the committee’s ranking Democrat and longest sitting member of the Congressional Black Caucus. If tampering is found, said the Detroit lawmaker, “there will be prosecutions” under federal law.

Watergate first surfaced as a short, curious story about a break-in at Democratic Party headquarters, in the summer of 1972. A decidedly low-tech crime, the Watergate conspiracy unraveled slowly as the Republican malefactors turned on each other, finally leaving their president naked to the world, disgraced. The Great Vote Theft of 2004, on the other hand, was in part a series of high-tech crimes against numbers – felonies designed to leave no physical trace, but which are evident through the patterns created by the perpetrators. Squads of dedicated sleuths are on the case – some of them at the top of their technical game – assembling data to reveal tell-tale patterns of massive vote fraud. There may soon be compelling circumstantial evidence of how the crimes were committed and, by deduction, the identity of the conspirators.

more


www.blackcommentor.com

as to not have the opening scene of F9/11 repeated, where the black house rep desperately tried to have one of our senators sign off on an investigation, maybe that should be one of our goals, a massive letter campaign to our senators begging them to look into the irregularities officially and not let the results be confirmed.

Um, yes I'm new -- if not clearly evident by the (1) next to my name -- I've been lurking for about a week now, 'post election anxiety and all' I needed a sanctuary and learned something in the process.

I got to thinking/wondering -- although I know this to be unlawful -- does anyone know or have 'HEEEEEARD' of the industrious hacker(s) attempting to duplicate what possibly might have happened election night? (i.e. attempting by way of modem to compromise the central tabulator/database)

Wouldn't that indeed be proof of something -- even if it's just to prove that it certainly could have happened?

The way I estimate it -- a person that does this and then reveals his/her findings would be seen as somewhat of a patriot -- since it is indeed against the law and they could probably expect to spend some quality time in a minimum security facility.

Thank you very much...
W--