Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fighting for a Fair Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 09:26 AM
Original message
Fighting for a Fair Vote
If this has been posted I missed it.



Fighting for a Fair Vote



John Nichols
Thu Jun 8, 1:02 PM ET


The Nation -- No one who paid close attention to the last two presidential elections can doubt that, come election time, secretaries of state play pivotal, sometimes defining, roles. Though most Americans would be hard-pressed to name the holder of the office that manages elections in their home state, after 2000 everyone knew that Secretary of State Katherine Harris was in charge of deciding who voted and whose votes counted in Florida. And after 2004 everyone knew that Secretary of State Ken Blackwell was doing similar duty in Ohio. These two "down ballot" officials served as co-chairs for George W. Bush's campaign in their respective states, but the real "service" they performed for the Republican cause came in what critics have identified as their aggressive manipulation of voting registration standards, unequal distribution of voting machines, intimidation of prospective voters and meddling with recount procedures to favor Bush.


The Ohio voting and vote-counting debacles of 2004 so unsettled Mark Ritchie, who coordinated that year's nonpartisan National Voice voter-registration and -mobilization campaign, that the veteran activist decided to leave the sidelines and jump into the electoral fray. Ritchie left his job as president of the Minneapolis-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, one of the largest nonprofit organizations in the country promoting sustainable development and rural communities, and announced he would mount a Democratic challenge to Mary Kiffmeyer, Minnesota's Republican secretary of state, with whom he had sparred over voter registration and access to polling places. Recalling the work he'd done as head of the 2004 coalition that registered 5 million new voters, Ritchie said, "Although we were very successful, we had to overcome obstacles created by the secretary of state's offices in Ohio, Florida and right here in Minnesota. Through this experience it became clear to me that we could not have fully free and fair elections under our current secretary of state."

Ritchie is not the only prominent figure to make a career change in order to run for a post on a platform that promises to manage voting and elections--a task that in most of the country falls to elected secretaries of state--in a manner that helps rather than hinders democracy. Debra Bowen, a California state senator who as chair of the elections committee led the fight to force firms that produce high-tech voting machines--especially the controversial Diebold Corporation--to guarantee that their equipment is reliable and accurate, just won the Democratic nod for secretary of state. As the progressive San Francisco Bay Guardian observed in its endorsement of Bowen. "She's saying what few in politics want to openly admit: It's possible to rig elections with this gear, and there aren't enough safeguards to prevent fraud." In Ohio, Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Jennifer Brunner resigned her position to mount a campaign that pledges to end the politicization of the secretary of state's office that has characterized Blackwell's tenure. Brunner says she'll work to assure that vote counts can be audited and verified, to enforce laws against voter intimidation and to distribute new voting machines equally in order to break the pattern of favoring GOP-leaning suburbs while saddling cities and rural areas with inferior equipment.

In Massachusetts, National Voting Rights Institute founder John Bonifaz, who led the legal fight for a full recount in Ohio two years ago, surprised political insiders by winning enough votes at this month's state Democratic convention to earn a place on the ballot for his against-the-odds Democratic primary challenge to veteran Secretary of State William Galvin. Urging voters to "elect a voting rights leader," Bonifaz accuses Galvin of failing to fight for common-sense election reforms, such as same-day voter registration and practices that encourage participation by citizens for whom English is not their first language. He says he wants to "create a model for free and fair elections for Massachusetts and for the nation."


More: http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060608/cm_thenation/20060626nichols

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. This needs a hotter title--permissible, I believe, since you are not
posting in "Latest News" (so don't have to stick to news article title).

Suggestions:

You want your country back? Here's the key.

Win or lose our democracy? Here's the battleground...

You want transparent elections? Help these candidates for Sec of State!

The battle is joined: fair vs. fixed elections? Candidates on the front line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's too late to edit.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay, let's see what attention it gets, then re-post later. This is so-o-
o-o-o-o important. It's hard to keep up with everything. I didn't know that much about the OH and Minn. efforts. Wow!

I think, multiple posts of this article, maybe each post with a specific focus on one of the candidates---giving their web sites, quotes, donation info, other news articles, whatever. This needs lots of attention NOW. People need to stop crying, stop being utterly appalled, start understanding the mechanism that the fascist junta is using this time, and GET ON IT.

These are brilliant candidates, aimed right at the dirty rotten heart of the coup. I am so encouraged by their willingness to stand up there with the entire spying/blackmail/secret torture dungeons/secret elections apparatus of the Bush junta intent upon destroying them! They are going to take a full blast of swiftboating, we can be sure. What do you think about organizing something here at DU--fundraising? spin control? educating voters in those states? encouraging/helping to organize poll watchers? what do we do best? To my mind, there are no more important races in the country--and possibly no more important political development, period, than the election reform movement. This is the "long term thinking" that I've been including in my "practical suggestions for the immediate future" (Resources for American Revolution II). They WILL steal more elections--possibly a renewed junta majority in Congress this year. What do we do THEN? Strong election reformers like Bowen, Bonifaz, Ritchie and Brunner won't take it lying down, nor should we. Gather evidence, make the case, and put CONTINUED and unrelenting pressure at the state/local level for transparent elections. We need to support these champions now, and put them into a position to cry foul if their own elections are stolen, and to continue the publicity and pressure, no matter what happens. And if they can win in these circumstances, all the better. The reform will be facilitated and move faster. And we'll have to be watching their backs for a long time. We can't let them be Shelleyed!

I've been thinking all these thoughts about Bowen. Now I'm thinking them about all four (and there may be others we don't know about yet). I tend to think Calif is the most important, not because I live here, but because of the obvious bushwhacking of Shelley, and installation of McPherson to get Diebold touchscreens re-certified and to stop Shelley's reform activities. And the Schwarz coup (with 125 candidates on the "Recall" ballot--jeez.) The junta is hellbent, here. Bowen's candidacy will help alert Californians. Californians will do the rest, whether they Diebold her or not. In Massachusetts, they've got 'Boston Harbor' right there, to throw the machines into. Ohio is so corrupt, I don't know if Brunner has any chance. (That's where they flipped the 60/40 vote on the election reform initiatives last year--biggest flipped vote we've seen--and barely a ripple about it from anybody.) Minnesota, that once great Liberal state, has likely not changed its coloration at all--only the voting system has changed, now in the control of Bushites. I trust that Minnesotans will respond, but I don't think Minnesota has the clout--the population, the Electoral votes--to spark nationwide reform. California does. (That's WHY they targeted Shelley.)

So, let's think what we can do here at DU to help these candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC