Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GA voters groups demand immediate decertification of Diebold.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:09 PM
Original message
GA voters groups demand immediate decertification of Diebold.
Things are coming to a head around the country. The new gaping Diebold security hole has prompted this action. VotersUnite



Voting Groups Call for Immediate Decerfication of Georgia's Diebold Election System
By Donna Price, Georgians for Verified Voting and John Fortuin, Defenders of Democracy
June 18, 2006


Georgians for Verified Voting and Defenders of Democracy recently called for the resignation of Secretary of State Cathy Cox for her position as the state's chief election adminstrator. they also called for the immediate de-certification of diebold election equipment for use in the state.

snip...

As representatives of the undersigned groups, we are calling on the Georgia State Election Board and the Office of the Secretary of State to immediately decertify the state’s Diebold Election System (DES). We call for the Georgia Elections Division to begin immediate preparations for the deployment of an alternative means of voting in time for the 2006 primaries and General Election.

A security vulnerability recently exposed in the architecture of the DES is being called a "major national security risk" by computer science and security experts. The effect of this vulnerability is that voting systems could be infected throughout an entire state, enabling an attacker to alter election results on a massive scale without detection. Once the vulnerability is exploited, the voting system could be under the control of the attacker, not only for the current election, but also for future elections.

"It's the most severe security flaw ever discovered in a voting system," said Michael I. Shamos, a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University who is an examiner of electronic voting systems for Pennsylvania…”

Link: http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1404&Itemid=113

Some links to other articles on the same subject, both of which require a sign-up before access:

Link: http://chronicle.augusta.com/login_1.4.shtml?orq:http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/061806/met_85770.shtml

Link: http://chronicle.augusta.com/login_1.4.shtml?orq:http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/061806/met_85786.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Demanding aint getting, especially in a state like Georgia
but my best wishes are with y'all that you're able to follow the lead of NM and get 100% verifiable paper ballots.

It took a really ugly lawsuit in this state to shame the lege and the DINO governor Richardson into getting that bill through and signed.

The suit is still in the court. ES&S is fighting it every step of the way, citing their disenfranchisement of 17,000+ of us is "intellectual property."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Awesome - More legal actions at Voter Action...
http://www.voteraction.org/

Lawsuits in:
»Arizona
»California
»Colorado
»New Jersey
»New Mexico
»New York
»Pennsylvania
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. >>TN and >>WA, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't hurt that Lou Dobbs is now on a rant about
these voting machines and how among other things there is no way to have a recount in case of a dispute. If Lou hammers an issue long enough others start mentioning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC