Florida Audit Reveals Serious Problems With State's Election Administration
Activists Welcome Aduit's Finding But That It Only Scratches the SurfaceDownload The Auditor General's ReportBy Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA
June 21, 2006
snip
According to the audit, the Department does not have a procedure in place to evidence for the public record that voting systems being certified had met the requirements of Florida law and does not prohibit the Secretary of State and any examiners from having a financial interest in the examination of and approval of voting equipment.
Further, the audit reveals that the Department does not maintain a current, reliable control listing of voting systems certified and in use by the counties, nor does it have a procedure in place to ensure that voting system information was on file with the Department.
The audit also found that the state incorrectly calculated the required maintenance costs that were included in the State of Florida HAVA Plan and also did not maintain the required level of expenditures for the 2004-05 fiscal year and salary certifications required for employees who worked solely on the HAVA Program were not maintained. The state has not instituted sufficient procedures to ensure that voter education programs are in compliance with Florida law and the state has not always followed Federal requirements with regards to awards to other State agencies.
snip
Florida election integrity activists welcomed the audits find but were quick to note that the findings only scratched the surface of problems with the state’s election administration. “The audit hasn’t covered half of it,” commented Anita Lapidus of Florida Fair Election Coalition (FFEC). “There is no security testing of these machines at the State or federal level. There is no way to recover lost votes.”
snip
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1415&Itemid=113