A modest proposal for Soros: steal an election for democracy

No, it's not what it sounds like. And it's a suggestion for anyone who has the ability to do it.

Those who reject the possibility of massive election fraud outright do so for one or two primary reasons. 1) they would never stoop so low. (This is patently absurd when you're talking about a Straussian administration.) 2) it's practically impossible.

We need to prove (2) is decisively false so the issue of election theft leaves the tin-hatted realm once and for all. All we need is someone to take a hit for the team. Someone needs to successfully steal an election (maybe start small, but a federal election would be most effective). THEN, after the election's over, admit you did it, and show how it was done.

Soros, Flynt, master hackers? Any takers?

suggesting he buy Diebold. I know, it's a long shot, but you gotta try.... ;-)

I think the better idea is to offer an enormous, can't-pass-it-up reward to a potential Diebold whistleblower.

machines. The bottom line is that a hard copy transaction log of every vote and by whom must be made public on a precinct basis. I mean by this that every vote on the transaction log would have an identifying ID of the individual who cast the vote. That could be either and ID chosen by the voter or the voter's name, both would be
electronically associated with the person's SS#. (Please don't start whining about taking our rights away by using SS#. At the present time
Democracy has ceased in the U.S. because of fraudulent voting procedures and by the loss of confidence in the system.)

After a couple of more election farces like 2000, 2002 and 2004, many , if not most, Americans will just stop voting. Why should they vote if the process is crooked?