Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bowen proposes improvements in CA election audits. (Sorry, still just 1%)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:52 AM
Original message
Bowen proposes improvements in CA election audits. (Sorry, still just 1%)
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 02:28 AM by nicknameless
Received by email. No link yet.
Land Shark’s Zogby poll result cited.

BOWEN MEASURE TO IMPROVE AND OPEN UP
CALIFORNIA’S ELECTION AUDIT PROCESS HEADS TO GOVERNOR



SACRAMENTO – Closing a loophole in California’s election auditing procedures and opening the entire process to the public are the goals of SB 1235 by Senator Debra Bowen (D-Redondo Beach), the chairwoman of the Senate Elections, Reapportionment & Constitutional Amendments Committee, which cleared the full Senate today on a bipartisan 40-0 vote and now heads to the Governor’s desk.

“Nearly half of California’s voters use an absentee ballot to vote and thousands of others take advantage of in-person early voting opportunities before every election, so the fact that some counties don’t include nearly half of the ballots cast in any given election in the auditing process undermines the integrity of the audit and the election itself,” said Bowen. “The 1% manual audit is designed to ensure the electronic voting machines and the ballot counters tallied the results correctly, but there’s no way to conduct a meaningful review if more than half of the ballots cast aren’t subject to the 1% audit requirement.”

Under California law, elections officials are required to conduct a public manual tally of the ballots cast in at least 1% of the precincts to check the accuracy of the votes tabulated by the electronic or mechanical voting systems. The law also requires the precincts subject to the audit to be randomly selected by elections officials, but it doesn’t define “random.”

SB 1235 (Bowen) improves the election auditing procedures in four significant ways by:

    * Requiring elections officials to include absentee, provisional, and all other ballots that are cast before Election Day or at satellite voting centers in the 1% audit;

    * Ensuring the precincts subject to the manual audit requirement will truly be randomly selected by requiring elections officials to use a random number generator to select the precincts to be manually counted;

    * Requiring a five-day public notice to be given before the precincts to be audited are selected and before the audit itself will be done, and ensuring both events are open to the public; and

    * Requiring the results of the audit to be made public, complete with an explanation of how discrepancies between the machine count and the hand count were resolved.


“At a time when the public’s confidence in our electoral system is dropping and 92% of those asked in a recent survey said voters should have a right to watch ballots being counted, improving and opening up the auditing process to ensure the accuracy and integrity of our elections only makes sense,” continued Bowen. “The mandatory manual audit law was created forty years ago when fewer than 4% of the state’s voters used an absentee ballot. Now, more than 30% of California’s nearly 16 million voters are registered as permanent absentee voters, 47% of the people who voted in the June primary election did so by absentee ballot, and it won’t be long before a majority of the state’s voters are mailing in their ballots from home.”

SB 1235 is a follow-up to last year’s SB 370 (Bowen), which requires elections officials to use the paper produced by the accessible voter-verified paper audit trail (AVVPAT) on all electronic voting machines to conduct the 1% manual audit and to use the AVVPAT in the event of a recount.

The Governor has until September 30th to sign, veto, or allow SB 1235 to become law without his signature.



Now about those voter rolls ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Einsteinia Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well with nearly 50% of the votes in CA
on absentee, this is extremely important.

Particularly ever since Conny McCormack decided the 1% manual recount was to come from the official canvass of all PRECINCTS, and then took the aggressive stance that all early voting (including absentees, etc.) were NOT from a precinct.

Unbelievable.

The truth is that she should have been hauled into jail, because she is NOT above the law. Is she? After she did this, other lazy registrars followed suit.

So, here comes St. Bowen fixing up the election integrity shambles once again.

Thanks for posting this nick o'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pretty remarkable that she got a 40-0 vote.
Both sides seem pretty fed up with the status quo.

"St. Bowen" O8)


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. McCormack also didn't go to jail for this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. have to save for tomorrow
night all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. 'Night

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. There was an unfortunate ammendment the press release missed.
The following line from the introduced bill was removed:

"provisional ballots, and ballots cast at satellite locations,"
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1235_bill_20060807_amended_asm.html


Tried following some of the links here, but couldn't figure out why (or for whom) it had to be ammended.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_1235&sess=CUR&house=B&site=sen


But here's the version I guess was voted on today.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1235_bill_20060821_amended_asm.html


But it sure is nice to get the absentee votes included, despite the ammendment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Satellites are included too.
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 11:55 AM by Bill Bored
<http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1235_bill_20060821_amended_asm.html>

(b) If absentee ballots are cast on a direct recording electronic
voting system at the office of an elections official or at a
satellite location of the office of an elections official pursuant to
Section 3018, the official conducting the election shall either
include those ballots in the manual tally conducted pursuant to
subdivision (a) or conduct a public manual tally of those ballots
cast on no fewer than 1 percent of all the direct recording
electronic voting machines used in that election chosen at random by
the elections official.
DRE at satellite location--->
:)

Also, I see nothing in this bill that would exclude provisionals.

"During the official canvass of every election in which a voting system is used, the official conducting the election shall conduct a public manual tally of the ballots tabulated by those devices,"

If the provs are counted by the machines, then they're included. If not, they're hand counted anyway, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC