Nader granted a Recount in 11 NH Wards

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041112-033826-6101r.htm

Washington, DC, Nov. 12 (UPI) -- Former independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader will get his vote recount in 11 counties in New Hampshire, the Nader campaign said Friday.

After submitting their initial written request Nov. 5, the campaign was able to raise the $2,000 needed to begin a vote recount, after receiving an extension from the New Hampshire attorney general. According to the campaign, certain precincts appeared "suspicious" with an unusual number of votes favoring President George W. Bush.

The campaign wired its down payment, raised by small donations, to the secretary of state's office Friday.

According to campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese, the recount will not be statewide; it will cover only 11 counties and a total of 45,000 votes.

right now, but it may be enough to expose the irregularities of the votes. It might be big counties he's recounting too? I don't know...but I hope so.

Maybe targeting is prudent....I just hope it does not go against their findings.....repugs can make lemonade out of prunes ya know.

have made it clear that I was just speculating. Sorry, liberalnurse!

all are flying by the seat of our pants. I do that on a daily basis anyways......grooming my survival skills.

nt

This is only around 50,000 votes total. But they are wards with 2 - 3 times the growth in Bush votes as in votes for the Democrat.

This should expose the fraud in relation to exit polls!


http://www.thewmurchannel.com/politics/3915133/detail.html

State Approves Recount For Nader
Campaign Pays For Recount
POSTED: 4:39 pm EST November 12, 2004

CONCORD, N.H. -- New Hampshire's election officials agreed Friday to a last-minute recount of the presidential race requested by Ralph Nader.

Nader asked for the recount last week, but the state initially said no because a check to pay for it had not arrived in time. Nader had until 4:30 p.m. Friday to get his check in.

The campaign electronically transferred the $2,000 fee to the state this afternoon, prompting officials to give the recount a green light.

Nader's campaign said some voting machines in the state logged results that favored President George W. Bush by 5 to 15 percent over what previous trends and exit polls would suggest.

Badnarik's website had a press release about it....


On Friday night, "Hardball with Chris Matthews" (7 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET) will be jumping into the fray. You won't want to miss that. Plus, this weekend here on Hardblogger, I'll be posting some amazing national election numbers and demographic trends that may shock you. I've run some of the numbers past a few MSNBC political analysts, and everybody is calling it "a big deal."

I don't trust that blonde haired whore.

Me either.

The wording of it kind of scares me.

I'll be posting some amazing national election numbers and demographic trends that may shock you.



This sounds like they could expose some stuff that does prove that Chimp got the votes in the heavily Democratic areas. Just be cautious with this one!

Did they change the show?

There are only 10 counties in NH. Nader will be recounting in 10 wards which are subsections of cities and towns. Concord for instance has 8 wards and the recount will encompass 45K votes. The recount is centered on south east NH which has the higher population and tends to be the more progressive part of the state due to the influx of people from Mass.

Hi everyone. First post here, although I've been reading for some time now.

I love it when you give money (like I did for the Nader recount) and then you see the direct result of your money. Sometimes money in politics can disappear into this huge morass (not moral ass...that's a separate thread entirely). I'm happy to see the recounts started so we can start to get some closure on this election.

We need to spread our money around. If you didn't give to the Nader recount, please consider giving to the Greens (Cobb) or Libertarians (Badnarik) for the OH recount. I think they'll need over $100,000. I don't have the links right here, but they've been posted in several other threads.

I'm proud to now be officially part of the DU community. You guys make me proud. I'm a longtime daily KOSsack, but there's much more activity here on the election stuff.

Thanks, all!

Yes it is amazing to see our money going to a great cause! I hope the Green Party and Libertarian Party can pull off a recount in OH!

Donations can be made here:

http://www.thealliancefordemocracy.org/

the DUers who got this whole thing rolling in the first place -- IdaBriggs and hedda_foil, with help from BBV.ORG as well. Contributions for NH should probably go directly to Nader, MARKED for the RECOUNT.

See these links:

FUNDING THE RECOUNTS -- See this before you donate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=201x2617

===========================================================
*****Want to Help America Recount? The website is UP!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1344801
Link: www.helpamericarecount.org

***** Donations for the Recount" Fundraising Kit > > >
(Use this to send to your friends -- enormous amount of info -- pick and choose what you need)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x37833


BACKGROUND:
DU INFO ALERT: Why Recounting in New Hampshire Could Save Democracy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2617155

Need Some DU Help w/New Hampshire Stuff!!! (URGENT)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=26802&mesg_id=26802

RALPH NADER MAY SAVE THE WORLD!!! (Its NOT Over in NH!) Updated Fri 8:15p
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x25116

Nader requests NH vote recount. (Did we just make a huge blunder?)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=965216

Nader, Cobb and Badnarik may all be willing to look into recounts in Ohio
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x26843

"hijacked from A to Z"!

I'm sure he can't be thinking HE would have won it in the end.

And welcome, Eganorion!

Why should we have to pay for our votes to be counted properly? Seems there would be plenty of volunteers who could do it for free (I know I would), but it just seems the ones who screwed it up ought to pay. Like Diebold and ESS, for example.

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

Please help!

Let's just hope the evidence is there. I believe it is, given the analysis.

Welcome to DU, eganorion! :hi:

I was afraid it wouldn't happen!

Go Nader!

Does anyone know more about the voting in these towns?

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/nader/articles/2004/11/12/state_approves_nader_recount/

CONCORD, N.H. -- State election officials agreed Friday to a last-minute recount of the presidential race requested by Ralph Nader.


Nader's campaign said some voting machines in the state logged results that favored President Bush by as much as 15 percent over what previous trends and exit polls would suggest.

Nader requested hand recounts in Litchfield, Sandown, Newton, Danville, Salem, Pelham, one ward in Somersworth and four wards in Manchester.

Nader's campaign could be required to pay additional fees as the recount proceeds. There was no estimate as to when the recount might begin.

Nader spokesman Kevin Zeese said the campaign would consider requesting additional recounts after reviewing the results of the initial 11.

Connect the arrows, straight-ticket option available. Your ballot, which is huge, is feed into the scanner as you exit the polling area. Salem is also Sununu country, although most of the population there hates both Sununus passionately.

I'm don't live there anymore, but I still vote there by absentee ballot, which was just like the one I've described above. Back in 2002, there were lots of problems at the polling stations--like repugs with signage and lots of police presence--totally over-the-top.

Any info on what the voting method is in these 11 counties. Touch screen, opti-scan, punch?

Now that it's already happening, I think you can trust me when I say I still don't think it's a good idea. I'm not a troll.

Doesn't anyone remember how there were two sets of early exit poll data, with one showing a 3% lead in NH and another showing a 18% lead.

The 18% lead just doesn't make sense. All the other early exit poll Kerry leads were within the margin of error from the pre-election tracking polls. 18% was way off.

The Republicans knew NH had a verifiable paper trail. This is a red herring designed to absolve the e-voting machines. Remember, Rove was talking about the huge lead in NH on Faux News. Why would he want to publicize it?

How could they do it? Switch the one's digit in the leak: 51-48 becomes 58-41.

Once this shows no fraud, the media will ridicule us, and this will provide evidence for using more e-voting next election.

I don't trust Ralph Nader. Everyone google search -->Frank Luntz exit poll<-- and see the other early exit poll that didn't show up on slate.

Don't back down from the fight is this turns out to be what happens!

http://redefeatbush.com/

Kerry avoided the trap set by Rove in backing away from challenging.

There WILL be recounts in NH AND Ohio!

In Somersworth, two of my relatives went to register to vote (they had moved to town earlier in the fall). One went in the morning - no problem, registered and voted. The other went in the evening and was told they could not register there -- they had to go back to their old home (two towns away). Completely bogus. My relative said, I kid you not - well I have a lawyer in my family, and they are in state today working on the election and I can call them. The voting person handed my relative the papers to register without saying anything. Someone told my relative this person had done the same thing to 3-4 other people.

Don't know if it is the same ward that is being recounted, but I can find out.

On edit: I heard the lines in Manchester were very long on election day. Most of these towns are close to each other - in southern part of state. Sandown, Newton and Danville are really right next to each other, and rural, all north/west of Salem. Pelham is in between Nashua and Salem sort of. Litchfield is northwest of Pelham Somersworth is near Portsmouth/Dover. Very interesting.

so we don't need to keep reposting this stuff.

Please see the link below
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2617155

This NH recount is absolutely fascinating, esp. as more and more stories like yours are told here. It doesn't sound as if the actual vote is anywhere near accurate.

If this recount goes the way we expect it to, we need to prepare ourselves. The recount in NY for the state senate was necessitated by machines that had been tampered with and, possibly, preloaded with votes. In spite of that info., the MSM is not reporting the reasons behind the recount. Nothing about the missing/damaged seals on the machines. Nothing about the machines being in the custody of an unauthorized person overnight before the votes were tallied. Nothing, or close to it. Should we hear positive results from NH, we may need to set off on another email/phone/letter campaign to get the word out. We absolutely cannot trust the MSM to report the facts. They appear averse to that, lately, for reasons unknown.

Just wanted to remind myself of this, too. ;)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x36777

Oddly enough, the news articles (linked in the above thread) regarding this story have been archived (or erased) on their respective sites. They are excerpted in the above thread, though, so you'll get the gist. I wonder if anyone who had the original link might have a copy of the article, too. You might want to ask them with a post in those threads. They're more likely to see it there.

Hope that helps a bit, anyway. I'll continue to look around and see what I can ferret out. ;) I'll post back here if I discover anythng else. Okay? :hi:

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:WMS8CSOdXYcJ:www.nynews.com/newsroom/110604/a01p0635senate.html+spano+election+tampering+seals&hl=en

I'll keep checking for any others. This article doesn't reference the machines being in unauthorized hands for a time. I KNOW I read that in an article. I just need to find it. I hope it's still available.

I would like to see a high post member (or preferably a few, or even better Ida/SoCalDem/Bev Harris) discuss the relevance of these counties, and how likely the possibility of fraud occuring here was.

Sounds a bit fishy that we are only going to get a recount for selected counties...Who picks those counties?

Rob

See my above link. The NH recount was initiated by Idabriggs.

Grumble grumble grumble.

someone really needs to summerize the accurate info and sticky it

I understand the relevance of New Hampshire and it looks like a master plan. I'd just like to see all the counties counted not a select few unless we can be sure that the counties being counted are definately suspect.

I have no faith whatsoever in protest marches and demonstrations. I pity the poor fools out there who think that their little signs are getting any attention from anyone who counts. The only thing that counts is ACTION and Ida has done it. Put your MONEY where your mouths are and make your donation to help pay for these recounts in Ohio and New Hampshire. There may be recounts in Florida too. Democracy has a price. It's time to pay!

who wold have thought Kerry would have folded like that. Even his voce president didnt know what was going on....

just a gesture. If the recounts show a narrow margin, Kerry will more than likely unconcede.

Nader is recounting 11 wards. Each county has numerous wards, who might use different kinds of voting machines. See this link--click on a county to see the wards within it:

http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?topic_string=5std&state=new%20hampshire

Nader requested hand recounts in Litchfield, Sandown, Newton, Danville, Salem, Pelham, one ward in Somersworth and four wards in Manchester.

According to this site http://www.sos.nh.gov/voting%20machines.htm
this is the voting method in each of these 11 wards:

Litchfield: Diebold Accuvote
Sandown: Optech Optical Scan
Newton: Diebold Accuvote
Danville: Optech Optical Scan
Salem: Optech Optical Scan
Pelham: Optech Optical Scan
Somersworth: Diebold Accuvote
Manchester: Diebold Accuvote


Nader has chosen the PERFECT Wards in NH to expose Voter Fraud!

Have the optiscan ballots been securely locked away somewhere, so that they could not have been tampered with?

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — State officials will conduct recounts in several disputed elections over the next two weeks.

The recounts were scheduled to begin Wednesday with three state representative races in Cheshire County.

Friday, officials will recount ballots in State Senate District 12, where Republican state Rep. Harry Haytayan of Hollis lost to Nashua Democrat David Gottesman by 188 votes.

Altogether, Secretary of State Bill Gardner will oversee recounts of 12 state representative races and three state Senate races over two weeks.

Recounts also are planned for state Senate Districts 8 and 18.

In District 8, Republican incumbent Bob Odell of Lempster beat Democrat Dave French of Langdon.

In District 18 in Manchester, Republican incumbent Andy Martel defeated Democrat Dave Gelinas.

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041113/NEWS02/111130045/-1/news

"The earliest this recount could begin is Nov. 24, the day before Thanksgiving Day. That’s because the next two weeks are already packed with more than a dozen recounts of legislative races.

The recount of votes in eight communities could take more than a day depending on how many teams of volunteers are assembled to help, Gardner said."


However, we will find out more from one of the wards in Manchester that is being contested by a Democratic candidate! There is a recount of that race on Friday!


"The recount covers all but one Manchester ward in state Senate District 18 where Republican Sen. Andre Martel of Manchester narrowly defeated Manchester Democrat David Gelinas.

Gelinas has filed for a recount that will take place next Friday.

“We had questions about some of the totals for our candidate in Manchester wards, so maybe Ralph Nader is raising the same questions we are,’’ said Dick Bouley, a Gelinas supporter assisting with the recount."