Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News, FRI. 12/8/06 Hmmmmm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:36 PM
Original message
Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News, FRI. 12/8/06 Hmmmmm
In relation to Land Shark's post, where to take the movement to next, who we have to address within We The People to effect the desired changes.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=461756&mesg_id=461756

Here is perhaps one reason. why some people do not vote.

An interesting thought from 2001 in Australia



Don't Vote.
It only encourages
power seekers.

I DIDN'T VOTE - ASK ME WHY?
I VOTED INFORMAL - ASK ME WHY?
Election day campaign.

Democracy should be much more than casting a ballot every three years. The people involved in a decision should be able to make that decision - DIRECT DEMOCRACY.

On election day we encourage all those Australians who will not be voting or will be voting informal, because they have no faith in the parliamentary system to stand at least six meters from the entrance of polling booths, holding up signs or wearing badges that state:-

I DIDN'T VOTE - ASK ME WHY?
I VOTED INFORMAL - ASK ME WHY?
On the 10th of November, political and social activists who are no longer willing to support the myth that power lies in parliament and who believe that parliamentary democracy is nothing more than two minutes of illusory power will be taking the message that people involved in a decision should make that decision - DIRECT DEMOCRACY directly to the Australian people.

Parliamentary democracy - two minutes of illusory power - why vote? I am 49, I have NEVER voted at a Local, State or Federal election and am not on the Electoral Roll, but I am standing as a SENATE candidate for Victoria at the Federal elections on the 10th of November, 2001.

snip

Even this scenario is an illusion because REAL power does not lie in parliament, it lies in the boardrooms of national and trans-national corporations. What parliament can or cannot do, is not only prescribed by the Australian Constitution, its power is limited by the needs of an economic system, it does not control. I am no longer willing to tolerate this SHAM and encourage Australians to seriously think about why they are participating in and supporting a system of government that makes a laughing stock of democracy.


http://www.takver.com/history/elections/election2001.htm



All members welcome and encouraged to participate.

Please post Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News on this thread.

If you can:

1. Post stories and announcements you find on the web.

2. Post stories using the "Election Fraud and Reform News Sources" listed here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph ...

3. Re-post stories and announcements you find on DU, providing a link to the original thread with thanks to the Original Poster, too.

4. Start a discussion thread by re-posting a story you see on this thread.


If you want to know how to post "News Banners" or other images, go here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph ...

Link to previous Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. CO: Hick's panel toying with bad proposals


Mail elections, career service aren't answer

December 8, 2006
Let's hope that no bad karma haunts Denver on Dec. 13.
That's the date when Mayor John Hickenlooper's panel investigating the debacles of last month's election is set to recommend policy changes to the Denver Election Commission - and possibly modifications to the City Charter.

We're not sure what structural reforms the panel will finally recommend - for instance, should one person be in charge of the commission, and would this manager be elected or appointed? But from all indications, the panel is poised to make at least two proposals that in our view are unacceptable: an all-mail election in May, and Career Service status for current and future Election Commission employees.

Of all the possible voting methods, mail-only balloting is the most susceptible to fraud. As if that weren't enough, many people simply don't want to vote by mail.

Colorado voters had the opportunity to mandate all-mail elections in 2002. That ballot measure was soundly rejected statewide, by a 58-to-42 percent margin. A smaller majority in Denver - but still a majority - gave a thumbs-down to that same proposal.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/editorials/article/0,2777,DRMN_23964_5198150,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Editor &Publisher: The Press Catching Up With Koehler on E-Voting Problems
Editor & Publisher

By E&P Staff

Published: December 08, 2006 10:20 AM ET
NEW YORK Eighteen months ago, Robert C. Koehler was virtually the only syndicated columnist commenting regularly about problems with electronic voting machines. Yesterday, he noted that some mainstream-media outlets are finally starting to catch up.

Koehler, who's syndicated by Tribune Media Services, wrote: "A year and a half ago, when I first started writing about disenfranchisement and the troubling evidence of electronic voting fraud in the 2004 election, this was not a respectable topic for mainstream discourse. Those who broached it were relegated to a spectrum of mockery that ran from 'sore loser' to 'conspiracy nut.' But the ongoing horror show of 'glitches' perpetrated on democracy by touchscreen voting machines this year can no longer be ignored even by those who would prefer to, and e-voting disasters are now being reported with some regularity.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/departments/syndicates/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003494607
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. CA: Court ruling gives Latinos OK to sue over at-large elections
San Francisco Chronicle

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, December 8, 2006

A state appeals court has reinstated a 2002 California voting-rights law that allows minorities to sue cities, counties and school districts that elect their governing bodies at large, rather than by district, in areas where voting divides along racial lines.

The little-noticed statute could have a major effect on local elections in the state, most of which require candidates to run in an entire city or county rather than smaller districts, said a civil rights lawyer who sued on behalf of Latinos in Modesto. Their suit claimed that at-large City Council balloting made it difficult for a Latino to get elected.

The 2004 suit was the first to use the state law, which is broader than the federal Voting Rights Act. It was halted, however, when a Modesto judge declared the law unconstitutional.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/12/08/BAGH6MRR181.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. CT: Registrar of voters: phone-in voting too slow
New Britain Herald

By: Kerry Heeran, Herald Staff
12/08/2006

NEW BRITAIN - City Democrats discussed the new optical scan balloting system for the 2007 municipal elections Thursday night during the Democratic Town Committee meeting.
"This past election was the last time that voters would ever use the lever-style voting machines in New Britain," said John McNamara, chairman of the Democrat Committee.
The old voting machines will be replaced by two advanced technologies. The city will receive 35 optical scanning machines, two for each district and one for counting absentee ballots for the next election.
The first machine, the AccuVote-OS system, allows voters to fill in the oval next to their chosen candidate, just like taking a test on a Scantron. The ballot will then be placed into an optical scanner and within seconds the vote is counted. The paper ballot will be then used as a paper record for the state in the case of a recount.
The second machine is the IVS LLC system, which was required at the past election in each voting district. The system allows voters with disabilities to use a five-button telephone and fax machine to call in their vote.

http://www.newbritainherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17565526&BRD=1641&PAG=461&dept_id=595283&rfi=6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. SD: Judge: S. Dakota City Discriminated Against Indian Voters
The New Standard

by Catherine Komp

Dec. 8 – Native Americans in South Dakota won a four-year-old legal battle this week when a federal court ruled that the city of Martin violated the Voting Rights Act and discriminated against American Indian voters.

The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of two Native American voters, challenged a 2002 ordinance that redrew the city’s three voting districts so that none had a majority of American Indians. Plaintiffs accused the small southwestern city of intentionally diluting Native American’s voting power.

Nearly 45 percent of Martin’s 1,078 residents identify as Native American.

http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/3958
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. VT: SOS Markowitz to serve on national panel to assess 2006 elections
Burlington Free Press

Published: Thursday, December 7, 2006
Vermont Secretary of State Deb Markowitz will be in the nation’s capital today to provide her assessment of the 2006 elections, a news release from her office said.

Markowitz said in the release, “As the president of the National Association of Secretaries of State, I am honored to represent my fellow chief state election officials and I am happy to be able to report that this year’s midterm elections went well overall for many of my colleagues nationwide.

"At the EAC today I will be outlining the successes as well as some of the problems we saw across the country as election administrators, for the first time, implemented all of the requirements of the Help America Vote Act.”

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061207/NEWS/61207010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. OK: Oklahoma should beware of untried voting systems
Enid News.com

Published: December 07, 2006 10:45 pm

The state of Oklahoma wants to revamp its election system to make reporting of votes faster and more efficient when the 2008 presidential election rolls around.

With all the controversies going on around the nation regarding revamped voting systems in other states, we have to urge the state election board to proceed with much caution.

The voting system for the last round of elections was pretty good. It did take awhile for the votes to be tabulated, but most were all completed by around midnight on election night.

Oklahoma uses optical-scan equipment to conduct elections. Voters use felt-tipped pens to mark their choices on paper ballots that are read and recorded by optical scanners. At the end of the night, the results are fed electronically to state election officials.

http://www.enidnews.com/opinion/local_story_341224503.html?keyword=topstory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. CS Monitor: Election controversy hits Florida, again
Christian Science Monitor

Sarasota recount is complicated by electronic voting systems. One solution: Bring back paper.

By Amy Green and Ben Arnoldy
SARASOTA, FLA.; AND BOSTON – The Sunshine State is once again the scene of a messy election controversy, and residents of Sarasota, an affluent beachside community, aren't the least bit amused.
More than a month after polls closed, the certified loser for the congressional seat is refusing to concede, given an extraordinary wave of ballots with no vote cast in that race and a margin of victory as skimpy as a bikini.

But determining just what went wrong, if anything, has proved difficult given the voting machines involved: touch-screen computers with no printout for voters to confirm. The problems roiling Florida's 13th Congressional District may be one reason that a federal advisory board on Tuesday recommended that the next generation of electronic voting machines be "software independent." In essence, that means creating an independent auditing trail.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1208/p03s03-uspo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. FL: iVotronic code could clear air
Herald Tribune

Recent articles in this newspaper document that many nonpartisan organizations across the country are suing manufacturers of the iVotronic and other touch-screen voting machines to reveal their proprietary source code. The writing of this source code, which is nothing more than a computer program for something as simple as counting and recording the number of times that a particular button is selected, is not that complicated and is well within the ability of an average high school student with basic programming skills.

So why is iVotronic so reluctant to release the code used in the Sarasota County voting machines during the District 13 race? Releasing the code is not just about placating sore-losing Democrats. If the shoe were on the other foot, I'll bet that Republicans would be equally interested in seeking out the truth. If there is nothing to feel guilty about, then why hide the code, especially if it can help to provide assurance that the touch-screen code is not tainted and the vote was fair?

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061207/OPINION/612070688/1029
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. WI: Towns won't appeal District 43 recount results
Gazette Xtra

(Published Friday, December 8, 2006 11:27:09 AM CST)

By Chris Schultz/Gazette Staff

JANESVILLE

Rep. Debi Towns, R-Janesville, won't challenge a recount that shows her 38 votes behind Democratic challenger Kim Hixson.

"If it were in the single digits, it might be different," Towns said.

Hixson's 38-vote lead is less than 0.2 percent of the 20,653 votes tallied in the recount that started Nov. 20.

Candidates may appeal recounts within five working days of totals being certified by the State Elections Board. The recount results for District 43 probably will be certified next week, said George Dunst, elections board attorney.

Towns said she will let the elections board certification stand as the announcement of the District 43 winner.

http://www.gazetteextra.com/towns120806.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. MN: Recount gives Ford the win


Friday, December 08, 2006

By Marshall Helmberger

Melanie Ford will be St. Louis County’s next attorney following yet another surprising twist in a seesaw race that Ford first appeared to win, then lose, then finally win again.
The latest turn came following this week’s recount, requested by Ford after official results showed her trailing longtime incumbent Al Mitchell by 53 votes. Initial totals had Ford in the lead, but errors spotted the day after the election had thrown 500 extra votes to Mitchell, which appeared to hand the race to him.

The recount results, announced Wednesday after three and a half days of counting by staff from the county auditor’s office, found minor errors in a number of cities and townships— and they added up to 141 extra votes for Ford, giving her a total of 40,019. Mitchell, who gained some and lost some in various locations, saw no overall gain at all, ending up with 39,931 votes, for a difference of just 88 votes.

http://www.timberjay.com/current.php?article=2848
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. OH: No change in U.S. House race after hand recount
Akron Beacon Journal

Posted on Fri, Dec. 08, 2006

Associated Press
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A hand recount in the disputed 15th congressional district ended with Rep. Deborah Pryce maintaining her 1,055-vote lead over Democratic challenger Mary Jo Kilroy.

The remainder of Franklin County's recount will be conducted by electronic machines because no discrepancies were found in the hand recount of more than 15,000 votes, 10 percent of votes cast in the race.

The final results should be known next week, Matthew Damschroder, director of the Franklin County Board of Elections, said Thursday.

Two other counties in the district have completed their recounts. In Union County, Kilroy picked up three votes; in Madison County, Pryce picked up four and Kilroy gained one.

Kilroy has refused to concede the race to Pryce, the Republican incumbent. The campaign awaits the results of the machine recount in Franklin County, attorney Don McTigue said.

http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/16192854.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. Kilroy won with the most votes from legal voters; manipulation to give Pryce official win
The Franklin County Board of Elections rejected 2600 provisional ballots, many of them from registered voters who voted in the wrong precinct. A 2004 directive from Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell for the first time disallowed the votes of registered voters in the county if they voted out of their precinct. Historically, all voters registered in the county had their votes counted from the county races up to the statewide and federal races. (The fact that the voters voted in the wrong precinct was mostly due to manipulated misfeasance/malfeasance-see EIRS reports- and there is no valid reason to not count votes of legal voters as long as they are voting in the correct Congressional District)

In another new development introduced in the 2006 election as a result of House Bill 3, voters were flagged with a stop sign symbol by their name in the pollbook. Free Press reporters saw some flagged voters turned away from the polls in violation of laws and others being allowed to vote in the wrong precinct, which would nullify their vote.

Both Pryce and Kilroy anticipate a recount, but voting rights activists question whether an actual “random” recount will occur. While Ohio law requires a random recount, with every ballot having an equal chance of inclusion, Blackwell has, in the past, allowed local Boards of Elections to determine their own methods for selection of ballots to be recounted. A sample by the Free Press and reports from recount observers in the 2004 presidential election, found non-random methods of selection predominated.

If the 3% recount of the paper ballots matches the official certified tally, the results will stand. If they don’t, then all of the ballots will have to be recounted by hand. This would mean counting the paper trail from the ES&S electronic voting machines in Franklin County.

When Election Science Institute recounted the ballots in Cuyahoga County following the 2006 spring primary meltdown, they found a 5% discrepancy between the electronic votes recorded on the Diebold personal electronic ballots (PEBs) and hard drives and the actual paper trails.

An audit sponsored by the Free Press in Miami County of Opti-scan machines found a similar discrepancy of 5% between the paper ballots and the results as scanned and centrally tabulated by a computer. The Free Press found that the Miami County results were not discovered during the 2004 presidential election recount because of flawed recounting methodology. Miami County officials unsealed the Opti-scan ballots, ran them through the counting machine, got a total, and then recounted by hand. The problem was that the results were not compared back to the officially certified results, but only to the machine counted results.

Numerous irregularities occurred, not just in the Kilroy-Pryce district that includes the western portion of Franklin County and parts of Union and Madison counties, but throughout Franklin County, which is the heart of Kilroy's support in the district.
• A total of 17,766 absentee ballots that were delivered to the Franklin County Board of Elections during the last two days of voting were included in the November 27 official count. A whistleblower contacted the Free Press and stated he saw tens of thousands of ballots stored in a post office warehouse in Columbus the weekend prior to the election. The ballots only had one stamp on them instead of the two required. This information was passed along to national Democratic Party officials. This may explain why there was a massive infusion of absentees uncounted in the 15th district. By tradition, virtually all of them are counted and posted first on Election night.

• The Free Press witnessed voters being unlawfully sent home for identification and unable to vote – in violation of a federal court order that entitled them to vote a provisional ballot with the last four digits of their Social Security number. In a race this close, this widespread practice may have resulted in the narrow margin of victory.

• An estimated 1,800 votes from more than 13 electronic machines that weren’t shut down properly by poll workers were also added in to the November 27 total. The problem remains as to the chain of custody regarding these machines and why so many failed to be handled correctly on Election Day.

• The Dispatch reported that nine Franklin County pollworkers "accidentally" took cartridges home that had to be later retrieved by deputy sheriffs.

• Charles R. Morrison II, a conservative Republican, was stopped by Secretary of State Blackwell’s office from running as an independent in the race. Had he remained in the race, his presence would have aided Kilroy. He later lost in his attempt to be placed on the ballot in federal court. Morrison had denounced the Pryce-Kilroy contest as the choice between “the lesser of two liberals.”
In a related case, Franklin County Judge Carol Squire also asked for a recount of 35 precincts where there was documented incidents where pollworkers incorrectly downloaded vote totals or shut down machines improperly. The Dispatch reported 26 different precincts suffered “mechanical” errors during the election and that “there were pollworker errors in nine precincts, including five in which results were downloaded onto two removable cartridges instead of one.”

The 2006 mid-term election problems are a continuation of the 2004 presidential election debacle in Franklin County. Election Protection activists repeatedly warned that problems were endemic to the electronic voting machines and that House Bill 3 was a “voter suppression” bill. Franklin Democratic Party officials have frequently denounced the Election Protection movement since 2004.

Ironically, Kilroy, who initially supported the election protection movement after the 2004 presidential election, reversed her position early on. After first calling for an independent investigation of the Franklin County Board of Elections, she allowed the Franklin County Board of Elections to conduct and direct its own investigation. Kilroy, currently a Franklin County Commissioner, is responsible for funding and overseeing the operations of the Franklin County Board of Elections (BOE). An investigative report by Mother Jones magazine designated Franklin County, Ohio one of the worst places to vote in the country.

Franklin County BOE Deputy Director Democrat Michael Hackett ended up resigning in 2006 after a contract-steering scandal involving storage carts for the new DRE machines. Former Ohio Democratic Party Chair Denny White was selected to replace Hackett after White resigned from state leadership following the 2004 Ohio election fiasco. Election Protection activists have charged that the Democratic Party treats the BOEs as patronage positions to reward Party insiders rather than as the key positions to preserve voting rights for the people. Franklin County BOE Director was suspended without pay for a month after he received a $10,000 check from a Diebold lobbyist made out to the Republican Party. His job was saved by William Anthony, who serves simultaneously as the Franklin County Democratic Party Chair and the BOE Chair.

Pressure from local activists forced the BOE to adopt a more visible and larger paper trail for its ES&S DRE machines. Under Ohio law, the paper trail is the actual ballot of record for an electronic voting machine, which will make the impending recount in the Pryce-Kilroy race easier.

Also, under House Bill 3, Kilroy, as a federal candidate, has no right to legally challenge her loss in Ohio state courts. After the 2004 Moss v. Bush case that challenged the results of that presidential election, the Republican-dominated state legislature passed the draconian House Bill 3 including a provision barring federal candidates from legally challenging election results in state court.

There is still indication that a truly random recount along with other revelations uncovered by the Free Press team could result in a Kilroy victory. To her credit, Kilroy has refused to concede. There is ample indication that she was, in fact, the rightful winner. Let’s hope she searches out every possible avenue and makes absolutely certain every vote is properly counted before a final verdict is reached in this crucial race.

--
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors, with Steve Rosenfeld, of WHAT HAPPENED IN OHIO, just published by the New Press and editors of the Free Press and http://freepress.org. Fitrakis was an independent candidate, endorsed by the Green Party for Governor of Ohio in 2006.

http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2006/1470

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. MA: Recount is now Dec. 16
The Enquirer & Mirror

By Jason Graziadei
I&M Staff Writer

The Board of Registrars voted Monday to conduct a hand recount of the ballots cast in the Nov. 21 special election after runner-up Patty Roggeveen, who finished only two votes behind Catherine Flanagan Stover, filed a formal petition with the Town Clerk’s office last week.

The recount will be held on Saturday, Dec. 16 at 8 a.m. in the Nantucket High School cafeteria.

In one of the closest elections in island history last month, Flanagan Stover claimed victory with 803 votes to Roggeveen’s 801, and plumber David Gray finished third with 373 votes. Former candidate Arch McColl, who died last month but remained on the ballot, received 15 votes.

On a unanimous vote, the registrars declared Monday that several of the allegations contained in Roggeveen’s recount petition - including irregularities between the preliminary and final vote counts, and claims that the layout and certification of the ballot were improper - had no merit.

http://www.ack.net/Recount120706.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. MI: The Recount Ends In A No Count


Democrat Kevin Pirlot was hoping that a recount of votes in the Dickinson County District 2 Commissioner race might overturn the results on election night last month. He lost to Republican Ann Martin by three votes.

It didn't work out that way.

Votes in Precinct 2 increased Martin's margin to eight votes, and then in Precinct 3, there were problems. It turns out the serial number on the back side of the box wasn't recorded in the poll book. That meant officials couldn't do the recount.

Bottom line? Martin is declared the official winner by an eight vote margin.

http://www.wluctv6.com/Global/story.asp?S=5785025&nav=menu134_2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Venezuela: The Spirit of Democracy in Venezuela
Trinicenter.com

Friday 8th Dec 2006

by Stephen Lendman
December 08, 2006

"Today we gave another lesson in dignity to the imperialists, it is another defeat for the empire of Mr. Danger....another defeat for the devil. We will never be a colony of the US again....Long live the socialist revolution....Destiny has been written....Socialism is human. Socialism is love." This is how Hugo Chavez Frias characterized his smashing electoral victory on December 3 when he appeared on the balcony of the Palacio de Miraflores (the official presidential palace residence) and addressed a huge gathering of his followers below that evening telling them of his victory for the people and that he now has an even stronger mandate to pursue his Bolivarian Project to do more for them ahead than he's already accomplished so far which is considerable.

He told his loyal, cheering supporters his impressive landslide electoral victory is one more blow to George Bush, and it follows on the others won by populist candidates in the region in the past six weeks by Inacio Lula da Silva in Brazil on October 29, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua on November 7, and Rafael Correa in Equador on November 26. Chavez will serve for another six year term that will run until December, 2012.

snip

Elections are now conducted in Venezuela using Smartmatic touchscreen electronic voting machines with verifiable paper ballot receipts that voters can check to assure they confirm the vote they cast and then are saved by the CNE to have as a permanent record of vote totals that can be used in case a recount is needed. They also require voters to leave an electronic thumbprint to assure no one votes more than once.

The machines work as intended leading the Carter Center to comment, based on their observations of their use: "The automated machines worked well and the voting results do reflect the will of the people." Further independent studies verified the same thing including ones carried out by vote-process experts at the University of California Berkeley, Johns Hopkins, Stanford and elsewhere. Great care was taken in their design to eliminate any possibility of tampering. It involves using a special technology splitting the security codes into four parts that has been endorsed in numerous voting security reports because it makes the machines used in Venezuela the most advanced system in the world according to the European Union Election Observation Mission in the country.

http://trinicenter.com/cgi-bin/selfnews/viewnews.cgi?newsid1165603373,71553,.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. IN: The ghost of elections past
Indiana Daily Student

WE SAY: The GOP wants a recount? Give it a rest!

By IDS Editorial Board | Indiana Daily Student | Friday, December 08, 2006

Upon reading the Nov. 29 IDS story "County Republicans file for vote recount in three races," a reasonable person might have laughed it off as a joke. But sure enough, just before the recount deadline, the Monroe County Republican Party paid the $11,000 needed to demand a recount of three races. The races, which were chosen to be a "random sampling" of government levels, are county recorder, District 2 county council and the ever-controversial race of Van Buren township assessor. All were chosen randomly to show the "voter fraud" that Republicans mean to seek out could have happened at any level.

But the Nov. 7 midterm election results are old news. Why recount the ballots now? We say this tastes strongly of bitterness.

The midterm elections, controversial as they might have been, are thankfully long over. Whoever would want to revisit the mudslinging corpses of elections past with even the slightest intent to reclaim additional votes, or throw out those deemed (only after the fact) illegitimate, should be labeled one sore loser. Claiming that changing the outcome of the election would only be an added "bonus," Monroe County Republican Party Chairman Franklin Andrew says the actual intent of the recount is to determine whether "everyone that cast a ballot in this last election is actually eligible to vote in Monroe County." The evidence they are looking for lies in absentee ballots and voter-registration forms. Yikes! Anyone who remembers a certain situation in Florida a few years back can tell you that this process could get really messy, really fast (dimpled, pregnant and hanging chads not included).

http://www.idsnews.com/news/story.php?id=39810&adid=opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. On DU: NYT: Changes Are Expected in Voting by 2008 Election
Thanks to Deep Modem Mom


NYT: Changes Are Expected in Voting by 2008 Election: Paperless voting machines will be obsolete
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=461918&mesg_id=461918
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. GOV DEAN: "You CANNOT Seat Someone If You Don't Have An Election That's Valid"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Status of RFK Jr's lawsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. BradBlog : Where's the Voter Fraud?
A Democracy Fellow and EAC Commissioned Researcher Says the Right is 'Propagating a Myth' in Order to Pass Disenfranchising Laws Said to Combat the Phony Perception They've Created
Not One Case of Voter Fraud Found by RNC in 2006...
Guest Blogged by Tova Andrea Wang, a Democracy Fellow at The Century Foundation.

ED NOTE: Ms. Wang was chosen by the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) to provide research and analysis for a report on "voter fraud." That report --- about which an early "status report" version leaked out after the EAC, apparently unhappy with the findings, failed to release it publicly --- showed little or no actual evidence of "voter fraud" in America. The EAC finally released their "final version" of the report on December 7th, retitled with a freshly coined phrase: "Election Crimes."

Over the past month, the silence has been deafening.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3891
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Florida election snafu could herald 2008 meltdown


Friday, December 08, 2006

Florida election snafu could herald 2008 meltdown


By Marshall Helmberger

One of the most important stories of the 2006 elections has gotten remarkably little play in the major media, and that’s unfortunate because it highlights the critical need for election reform in the U.S. You probably haven’t heard much about the missing votes in Sarasota County, Florida, where Republican U.S. House candidate Vern Buchanan was recently named the winner in his race over Democrat Christine Jennings, by a margin of 369 votes.
To some degree, it matters little who actually wins this race, since the Democrats will hold the majority in the House by a wide margin, regardless of who is eventually seated in Florida’s 13th District.

The real issue is how to address an estimated 18,000 votes which went missing on election day, and how to prevent it from happening in the 2008 presidential election, when the winner of the White House could, once again, be decided in Florida.

At issue in this case is the almost inescapable fact that thousands of votes cast on electronic voting machines in Sarasota County in the House race did not appear when the votes were tallied at the end of the day. Election officials in the county have been under fire for weeks, but have yet to offer a reasonable explanation for the disappearance of so many votes. Their only argument has been to suggest that thousands of Sarasota County voters (a whopping 13 percent) turned out on election day, only to opt against casting a vote in the hotly-contested House race. Their votes appeared in other races, but somehow they failed to record votes in the Buchanan-Jennings contest. While few voters vote in every race on the ballot, only about 2-3 perent of voters in neighboring counties failed to vote in the House race. And about 98 percent of absentee voters in Sarasota County did cast votes in the Buchanan-Jennings race, all of which makes the suggestion of some election officials utterly implausible.

http://www.timberjay.com/current.php?article=2837
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. CA: Miscarriage of justice ( Heller)
Contra Costa Times
EDITORIAL
Posted on Fri, Dec. 08, 2006


CASES such as Stephen Heller make whistle-blowers an endangered species.

The Van Nuys actor and temporary worker recently pleaded guilty to a computer crime, agreed to pay a $10,000 fine, and write an apology to Diebold and its Los Angeles attorneys, Jones Day, for making confidential Diebold legal memos public in 2004.

Heller had copied and released 500 pages of memos and other data indicating Diebold violated election laws by peddling in Alameda and other counties software that had not been tested or approved for elections.

Several MediaNews papers in the Bay Area published some of the documents. Shortly thereafter, state election officials decertified Diebold touch-screen systems statewide.

Though critics of electronic voting consider Heller a brave whistle-blower with the public's interest at heart, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office announced an indictment on charges of unauthorized access to a computer, second-degree burglary and receiving stolen goods. Each charge could have resulted in his being sentenced to four years in prison.

Working as a word processor, he had heard a taped statement by a Jones Day attorney describing ways Diebold could get around state law and its $12 million contract with Alameda County.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/opinion/16193127.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. article: get legal advice first!
the article goes on to say:

"Before making a decision to break or try to skirt the law, whistle-blowers must weigh the consequences and explore legal avenues for going public with such information. Caution -- such actions carry legal consequences -- talking to a lawyer, law enforcement and the press first may help inform and guide your decision about such a venture.

Gathering information and examining all legal avenues and options is prudent when considering such an undertaking.

We respect Heller for his integrity and attempt to do what's right. We hope eventually his conviction is expunged. And, it would be fitting if some like-minded party stepped forward to pay his fine."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. K&R. Thank you, rumpel!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. pleasure
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC