Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

American Statistical Association Calls for Audits to Increase Confidence in Electoral Outcomes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:51 PM
Original message
American Statistical Association Calls for Audits to Increase Confidence in Electoral Outcomes
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2008/3/prweb773424.htm

ASA Board adopts position on Electoral Integrity.

Alexandria, VA (PRWEB) March 17, 2008 -- The Board of Directors of the American Statistical Association (ASA) today called on the federal government to take actions, including election audits, that would assure greater levels of voter confidence in electoral outcomes. The specific actions recommended by the Board include conducting broader research into the integrity of elections, providing tools to help election officials conduct high-integrity elections, and recommending designs of acceptable ballots as well as procedures for testing ballots on the actual machines that will be used to record the results.

The Position on Electoral Integrity adopted by the ASA Board at its March meeting states, "It is critical that the integrity of central vote tabulations be confirmed by audits of voter-verified hard-copy records in order to provide high - and clearly specified - levels of confidence in electoral outcomes… Certification of any electoral outcome should require substantiating evidence that the putative winner was the intended selection of the plurality of voters. Compelling statistical evidence of electoral failure should be accepted as a basis for judicial remedy."

The ASA statement also encourages state governments to adopt routine monitoring of all electoral procedures to ensure continuous quality improvement.

The ASA Board position statement resulted in part from knowledge gained through the involvement of several ASA members in the controversy following the contested elections of 2000 (Presidential), 2006 (Florida Congressional), and the ongoing concern over the need for a paper trail in the upcoming presidential elections.

"After reviewing reports of statistical evidence of problems in several recent races," said Peter Lachenbruch, ASA President and Board Chair, "the Board felt it was important for the ASA to urge establishment of electoral processes that reaffirm the public's trust in our elections. Statistical methods can provide confidence in well-conducted contests. They can also identify common sources of problems and help avert future electoral failures."

The complete ASA position statement follows:

"Trustworthy elections demand integrity throughout the entire electoral process, from voting laws and regulations to details of implementation, including maintaining voter registration lists and a secure chain of custody for voted ballots. All processes and data of US elections should be subject to statistically sound, continuous-quality monitoring and improvement. Data releases should be comprehensive and timely and follow standardized, readily analyzable formats. It is critical that the integrity of central vote tabulations be confirmed by audits of voter-verified hard-copy records in order to provide high -- and clearly specified -- levels of confidence in electoral outcomes.

"The American Statistical Association recommends that the federal government synthesize and extend existing research into the effects of various practices on the integrity of elections, and disseminate tools that help voting officials to efficiently conduct high-integrity elections. In addition, the federal government should provide examples of acceptable and unacceptable ballot designs and specify procedures for adequate pre-testing of ballots on the actual machinery to be used in the election. The ASA encourages state governments to adopt routine monitoring of all electoral procedures to ensure continuous quality improvement. Certification of any electoral outcome should require substantiating evidence that the putative winner was the intended selection of the plurality of voters. Compelling statistical evidence of electoral failure should be accepted as a basis for judicial remedy."

About the American Statistical Association
The American Statistical Association (ASA), a scientific and educational society founded in Boston in 1839, is the second oldest continuously operating professional society in the United States. For 168 years, ASA has been providing its membership (currently 18,000) serving in academia, government, and industry and the public with up-to-date, useful information about statistics. The ASA has a proud tradition of service to statisticians, quantitative scientists, and users of statistics across a wealth of academic areas and applications. For additional information about the American Statistical Association, please visit the association's web site at http://www.amstat.org or call 703.684.1221.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. How does the American Statistical Association
feel about 100% hand count of the paper ballot, if they have a percentage of ballots that they feel would be statistically sound and would give Americans a level of confidence then they should be tickled f*ck*ng pink that there are Americans which numbers are growing by the day, that are willing to Hand Count all the Paper Ballots.

A full and complete audit.

Certainly the American Statistical Association wouldn't have a problem with a 100% audit, would they?

Cause they are gonna get one. We are growing in numbers, day by day.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That isn't an audit at all
Hand counting the ballots would be the process itself, not an audit of the process. An audit would have to be random recounts, or possibly just using a different method for counting, for instance weighing the ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's good news!
When Clinton or Obama fights back after the election is stolen in November, it will be important to have a group of stats experts on the side of election fairness. The lay public isn't going to understand all the complicated statistics involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC