Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election commission is challenged to explain voting machine accuracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:59 PM
Original message
Election commission is challenged to explain voting machine accuracy
July 17, 2008Recommend (1)

By Bill Mego


"With all the mechanical improvements they have in the way of adding machines, and counting machines, they can't seem to invent anything to take the place of the old Political mode of counting - two for me and one for you. More people have been elected between Sundown and Sunup, than ever were elected between Sunup and Sundown." Indeed, when Will Rogers wrote that, we could not mechanize vote fraud. But now that we have things like Premier/ Diebold touch screen voting machines, votes can be stolen whether it's night or day.



Of course, it's not the machine that steals them.



Diebold machines are, as our election commission proclaims, fairly accurate. And we do not, in fact, know that any votes have ever been stolen electronically in DuPage County. All we know is that they have been stolen in other places and that, if they were to be stolen here, the design of the machines guarantees that the theft would be absolutely undetectable.



The criticisms that have been leveled at the DuPage County Election Commission have had more to do with the appearance of impropriety. They've been about some members' close personal relationships with both the manufacturer and distributor of the voting machines, for example, and the kind of cross fertilization that, frankly, is not unusual in "old boy" networks.



There's nothing in the commission's charter, however, that mandates objectivity or that forbids doing business with cronies. The commission simply certifies election judges, registers voters, and redistricts precincts. In short, it conducts elections, and its only responsibility to the people of DuPage County is to ensure that every vote is counted, and counted fairly.



Were we using only paper ballots that could be kept indefinitely, so they could be sampled after the election, or if the state Legislature had mandated touch screen voting machines with open source software, nobody would have to worry about his or her vote.



http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/mego/1060604,6_4_NA17_MEGOCOLUMN_S1.article

Bill Mego's column is published each Thursday. Contact him at bill.mego@sbcglobal.net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked and REcommended!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks, but
that's it? the home of henry hyde is getting the once over, dupage stinking county, and all i get is one tiny kick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, you did get 4 recommends.
But where is the 5th. :(


Good article except this graph...

"Were we using only paper ballots that could be kept indefinitely, so they could be sampled after the election, or if the state Legislature had mandated touch screen voting machines with open source software, nobody would have to worry about his or her vote."


Yikes!

If people think VVPAT is a waste of time they oughtta be really concerned about th open software idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. in my experience,
nobody really has any idea what they are talking about most of the time when it comes to voting machinery. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Same here.
:nuke: :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Looks Like Your Post Made it to the "Greatest" Page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. well,
let's give er another kick, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC