The 2010 Senate Forecast Simulation Model
Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll) source: http://richardcharnin.com/2010SenateForecastSimulationModel.htmAug. 27, 2010The 2010 Senate Forecast Simulation Model determines a forecast probability distribution of the GOP gains using sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. The model is based on the latest Senate polling and assumes that the election is held today and will be updated periodically. To determine a probability distribution for net GOP gains, four election simulations were executed. The simulations were based on the latest polling win probabilities.
Assuming a fraud-free election and current polls, the best-case scenario for the Democrats is that the GOP will gain five net seats. The worst case scenario is that the GOP will gain nine.
But assuming election fraud (i.e. Democratic vote share is reduced by 3%), the Democratic best-case scenario is that the GOP will gain nine seats. The worst case fraud scenario is that they will gain eleven. The model indicates that the states where fraud is most likely to occur are IL, KY, NC, NV, PA and WI.
The most important factor in any election is voter turnout. High turnout is always good for the Democrats. Pre-election registered voter (RV) polls are superior estimates of the True Vote (not the recorded vote) in high turnout elections like 2004, 2006 and 2008. In 2010, Democratic turnout is expected to be low. The GOP is poised to make significant gains in the House and Senate. Because of the low expected turnout, the model does not currently factor whether the polls are RV or LV.
The percentage breakout of undecided voters is always a key variable in any election forecast. The base case assumption in the model is that the Democrats will win 60% of the undecided vote. The rationale is that most undecided voters are “Professional Progressives” who may stay home on Election Day.
The simple formula: Projected share = Poll share + undecided voter share.
Election fraud is a key factor that is overlooked in polling models. The Fraud Factor is defined as the percentage deviation from the True Vote.
The formula is
Recorded Vote share =
True Vote share +
Fraud FactorThe model assumes that the True Vote is equal to the Projected Share.
Therefore, the
Recorded Vote share =
Projected share +
Fraud FactorBecause of the uncertainty in the base case assumption, a
sensitivity analysis table displays a 40-60% Democratic share of undecided voters. The other base case assumption is that the elections will be fraud-free (i.e. vote switch = 0%). Based on the
historical record, this is unrealistic. The sensitivity analysis displays the effects of 0-4% vote switching from the Democrat to the GOP. There are a total of 25 scenarios in the sensitivity table, 5 UVA * 5 Vote Switch.
Assumptions:
Fraud: 3% reduction in Democratic share
Case 1: 50% of undecided voters break to the Democrats (UVA)
Case 2: 60% UVA
No Fraud
Case 3: 50% UVA
Case 4: 60% UVA
Probability GOP will gain at least the number of seats indicatedCase
Fraud
1
2
No Fraud
3
4
Seats
9
8
6
5
Probability
74%
72%
75%
52%
8/27/2010Status: (S)afe, (L)ean, (T)ossup
Latest Poll
Projection
Vote Switch
0%
DemWin
State
AL
AR
AZ
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
IA
ID
IL
IN
KS
KY
LA
MD
MO
NC
ND
NH
NV
NY
OH
OK
OR
PA
SC
WA
WI
WV
Fraud
Threat
*
*
*
*
*
*
Current
Seat
Held
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
Status
Current
Leading
Tossup
S
S
S
T
L
L
S
S
S
S
S
S
T
S
S
T
L
S
L
T
S
S
T
S
L
S
S
L
S
L
T
S
Dem
16
9
4
30
35
34
49
40
50
36
21
35
68
35
27
45
30
23
42
41
55
41
37
22
38
48
54
39
31
50
31
20
45
46
35
Rep
16
23
2
59
60
53
44
49
40
47
40
47
20
55
64
45
51
59
41
51
39
34
39
69
51
50
29
48
65
36
40
62
52
47
51
Undecided
11
5
13
7
11
10
17
9
18
12
10
9
10
19
18
17
8
6
25
24
9
11
2
17
13
4
14
29
18
3
7
14
Margin(29)
(25)
(19)
5(9)
10(11)
(19)
(12)
48(20)
(37)
0(21)
(36)
1(10)
167(2)
(47)
(13)
(2)
25(9)
(34)
14(9)
(42)
(7)
(1)
(16)
Undecided
Dem60%11
Repub Net36.6
38.0
41.8
53.2
46.6
56.0
46.2
42.8
45.8
75.2
41.0
32.4
51.0
41.4
33.8
52.2
45.8
58.6
56.0
51.4
27.4
44.6
49.2
64.2
46.8
33.4
58.4
48.4
30.8
46.8
50.2
43.4
Rep40%21
563.4
62.0
58.2
46.8
53.4
44.0
53.8
57.2
54.2
24.8
59.0
67.6
49.0
58.6
66.2
47.8
54.2
41.4
44.0
48.6
72.6
55.4
50.8
35.8
53.2
66.6
41.6
51.6
69.2
53.2
49.8
56.6
ProbabilityMoE± 3.00%0%
0%
0%
98%
1%
100%
1%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
74%
0%
0%
92%
0%
100%
100%
82%
0%
0%
30%
100%
2%
0%
100%
15%
0%
2%
55%
0%
Sensitivity AnalysisRepublican Senate Seat Net Pickup
Undecided Voter Allocation to Democrat
Vote Switch to Rep
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
9
9
11
11
11
9
9
9
11
11
7
9
9
10
11
6
8
9
10
10
5
6
8
9
10
Assumptions:Variable
UVA to Dem
Vote Switch
Net Rep
Gain0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case 1Fraud
50%
3%
Probability
Exact
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
23%
46%
25%
3%
Cum
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
74%
28%
3%
0%
Case 2Fraud
60%
3%
Probability
Exact
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
5%
22%
52%
19%
1%
0%
Cum
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
94%
72%
20%
1%
0%
0%
Case 3No Fraud
50%
0%
Probability
Exact
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
5%
20%
42%
26%
7%
0%
0%
0%
Cum
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
75%
33%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Case 4No Fraud
60%
0%
Probability
Exact
0%
0%
0%
2%
10%
38%
38%
13%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Cum
100%
100%
100%
99%
89%
52%
14%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%