Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bush really lose NJ by only 7pts, or could have it been much more?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 07:30 PM
Original message
Did Bush really lose NJ by only 7pts, or could have it been much more?
A friend sent this to me at work today. It's quite telling.

The exact makes and models of the machines scheduled to
be used in New Jersey have been deemed insecure by the
Secretaries of State in Ohio, California, Nevada and the Board
of Elections of New York City.

<http://www.eff.org/Activism/E-voting/20041021_NJ_complaint.pdf>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes he did, Yes they are
I believe Bush really did lose NJ by only 7 points. Believe me, there are many VERY Republican areas of the state. Bush support was frightenly deep here.

That doesn't excuse our voting method though. The Sequoia machines replaced the old mechanical machines a few years ago. These systems are the ultimate black box. They are easy to use but that's about the only positive thing to say about them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. May be nice to believe, but I can never believe anything without
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 07:05 PM by fearnobush
proof. I know my hair dresser in Ocean County was turned away from a Toms River precinct, refused a provisonal ballot, went to Ocean County Court Court House, waited 4 hrs, and was barely allowed to vote. She said people were being denied to vote and that there were hundreds of people mad as hell at the court house waiting to be seen by the judge. She said she saw an elderly black woman crying, (denied) as well as many others who simply left, not voting because they had to go to work.

From the linked case study:

Upon information and belief, in 2000, newly purchased
Sequoia Pacific AVC Advantage machines used in South Brunswick,
New Jersey failed to shut down or issue an alert when an internal
malfunction occurred. This caused zero votes to be reported for
certain major party candidates.

37. Plaintiff Stephanie Harris attempted to vote on a
Sequoia Pacific AVC Advantage machine in Mercer County, New
Jersey, on June 8, 2004 at the Hopewell Elementary School polling
location. She attempted to cast her vote on the machine four
times. After she believed she cast her vote, she was told to
return to the booth because her vote had not registered. The
poll worker on duty told her three times to return to the voting
booth and press the “Cast Vote” button because her vote had not
registered. She pressed it a total of four times. She has no
idea whether she voted once, twice, three or four times, or not
at all.

38. When she exited the voting booth the fourth time, the
poll worker tentatively advised her: “I think it went through.”
She was not offered any alternative methods to cast her vote
(such as an emergency ballot) and cannot be sure if her vote was
ever properly recorded. Upon information and belief, at a
meeting of the Mercer County Board of Freeholders a
representative of the Mercer County Board of Elections stated
that no incident reports had been filed for Hopewell.

39. Plaintiff Harris’s experience is not unique. Mercer
County resident Glenn Cantor had a similar experience when he
attempted to vote on a DRE at the Hopewell Valley Regional School

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. NJ had many problems. I heard NYC had big problems too. Cops didnt come
to open polling places. Machines did not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's GALLING that the election is being called "smooth" --
it's only because problems like this haven't been reported on.

GRRRRR.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Definitely deserves
a :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC