Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some questions about Norman Mailer:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:43 PM
Original message
Some questions about Norman Mailer:
Why did he have to use the word "fug"?

If he was so insistent on imitating real speech, why did he settle for "fug"? Why not a simple damn or hell?

How silly must he feel today about using the word "fug"?

Will he ever issue a revised version of the Naked and the Dead using the word fig (as in Oh, fig!)?

Has he gotten into so many fights over the years because any one who uses the word "fug" has to prove his manhood?

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Burnsey_Koenig Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not?
It is a word, and I have to ask why you put it in quotes as if it wasn't?

And for any that don't know what it means it is A heavy, stale atmosphere, especially the musty air of an overcrowded or poorly ventilated room

the word actually describes that event rather well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you mean "The Naked and the Dead," it was published in 1948--he had to
Edited on Tue Nov-21-06 01:54 PM by lulu in NC
find a substitute that was acceptable but immediately comprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I am just amused by the notion of someone so macho that he had
to prove he knew what word was really used rather than observe the convention of substituting a milder explicative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think he was trying to be more realistic than conventional (conventional c.1948). nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC