Pet peeve--no quotation marks for dialogue! Am I being

gratefultobelib

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-22-07 09:21 PM
Original message

Pet peeve--no quotation marks for dialogue! Am I being

lazy or picky or what? I do find it hard, though, to get into a book sometimes when I have to dig the dialogue out of the narrative. However, I seem to remember Cold Mountain was w/o quotation marks and I loved that book. Oh well... just wondering what some of the rest of you literary folk thought.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Sal Minella

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-22-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message

1. Takes a really good writer to pull it off, I think. The voice of the dialog

has to leap out of the text, almost as though it's in a different color (visual thinker here, can you tell). With most writers it just looks pretentious, and I find it exceedingly annoying and always wonder why the writer was too lazy to put the quotation marks in.

So you may be picky and peevish, but you ain't alone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Orrex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-22-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. You said it exactly IMO

Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 11:11 PM by Orrex

My first extended exposure to quote-less dialogue was McCarthy's Blood Meridian, and I admit that it took a while to get the hang of it. But McCarthy is so skilled in the technique that the characters' speech readily distinguishes itself from the surrounding text.

But if it's not used carefully, it can be a disaster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Captain Hilts

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-22-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message

2. Man, I HATE that! Agree! nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

shimmergal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-23-07 02:23 AM
Response to Original message

4. I hate it too.

Even if the writer is skilled at using it, constant readers are TRAINED to subconsciously recognize dialogue from the quote marks. Leaving them out means extra work for the reader, that could be better spent on the deeper aspects of the story.

I tend to view it as an affectation that says the writer wants to be: 1) Literary and 2) different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.