After a teddy bear incident and much debate, the House of Lords votes to abolish it.
...
Thus began a period of collective soul-searching on free speech and secularism, traditional values and the church that anoints Britain's queen. It culminated Wednesday in a 148-87 vote in the House of Lords to abolish the laws on blasphemy after a wrenching, two-hour debate.
"It is crystal-clear that the offenses of blasphemy and blasphemous libel are unworkable in today's society," Kay Andrews said in introducing the government-backed amendment, adding that "as long as this law remains on the statute books, it hinders the UK's ability to challenge oppressive blasphemy laws in other jurisdictions."
...
Wednesday's vote in the upper house of Parliament was an amendment to a broad proposed law on criminal justice that must still go back to the House of Commons for approval before taking effect. Still, the vote was seen as a crucial hurdle in a process that is now all but assured.
"The law on blasphemy will be abolished. And good riddance, is what we say," Terry Sanderson, president of the National Secular Society, said in an interview. "It's an unusable law, as it stands at the moment, and in the past it's been a very cruel law."
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-blasphemy6mar06,1,1925105.story?ctrack=2&cset=trueHooray. It's been sitting there as a stupid law (with a rather vague past) for ages, and not long ago, people said it was going to be too difficult to actually get rid of it. But it turns out to being going with very little fanfare at all, in the end. Some of the Church of England bishops who get automatic seats in the House of Lords (another relic of theocracy that needs changing in Britain) did vote to get rid of the law:
Dr Sentamu did not vote in the division to the amendment. The Bishops of Durham and Portsmouth both voted with the Government; while the Bishops of Chester, Rochester, and Southwell & Nottingham all voted against the amendment.
http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=53079