Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Protestant Denominations Back Virginia Episcopal Diocese -- in fight against breakaway congregations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:27 PM
Original message
Protestant Denominations Back Virginia Episcopal Diocese -- in fight against breakaway congregations
WP: Denominations Back Va. Diocese; Episcopal Church Challenges State Law in Property Dispute
By Michelle Boorstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, May 24, 2008; Page A06

A half-dozen national Protestant denominations are supporting the Episcopal Church in a multimillion-dollar Virginia property dispute, saying a state law at the heart of the case could threaten them, too.

The United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (USA), among others, have filed court briefs in the past few weeks supporting the Episcopal Church, which is fighting 11 breakaway Virginia congregations that say the national church has become too liberal on issues from salvation to sexuality. Majorities of those congregations voted to leave and are now in Fairfax County Circuit Court over who gets to keep the property.

Experts say there are 50 to 100 similar property cases across the country, mostly involving Presbyterians, Methodists and Episcopalians. Most involve disputes over what scripture says about same-sex relationships. Cases have been decided in favor of both sides.

The filings loosely connect millions more U.S. Christians to the complex Virginia case, which blends U.S. church history with property law and questions about church-state relations. Among the groups signing on are the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church and the Seventh-day Adventists....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/23/AR2008052302743.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't want the sheep to think for themselves ...
..the sheep that tithe every year to pay the bills and build the buildings. That just wouldn't be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gotta link? "At issue is the real and personal property of 11 Episcopal churches. In each case ...
... that property currently is occupied and used by non-Episcopal congregations. Four continuing Episcopal congregations have been denied use of their property, locked out of their buildings, deprived of their rights to that property and forced into exile" http://www.thinkinganglicans.org.uk/archives/002736.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. At issue is going from a trinitarian faith to a universalism ...
... without proper theological preparation. The issue is 30+ years of watering down the standards and a dying denomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If the Episcopalians are really abandoning trinitarianism, you'll be able to provide a link
Here's the denomination website. Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. no -- they are not giving up trinitarianism.
the most liberal episcopal churches are still all about the trinity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Oh please
The issue is bigotry. And old guys disliking the idea of women or gay folks being treated like equals.

The theology hasn't changed. Enough people have just begun to actually embrace the ideals of Christ wrt welcoming and loving *everyone*. All this "theological dying down" is a bunch of nonsense.

Some of the most inclusive churches are the most "high church" - traditional, very anglican, very tied to the theology that's been a part of our church for centuries. Likewise, many of those screaming about how "traditional" and "anglican" they are are nothing more than jumped up non-denominational or AOG people hoping to keep their hands on the property of the Episcopal church, while using their very different theology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yeah, except that's not how it works, or has ever worked
We're not a congregational church, where each parish is totally on its own. We're organized by diocese, and then within the larger national church.

Those buildings belong to the diocese, in trust for the church as a whole. Always have. Now we have people who suddenly don't like actually having to include people with a differing gender or sexual orientation in their church. And they want to leave. Problem is, they want to leave and take the buildings and the other property with them. It just doesn't work that way. They're quite free to go - but they're leaving the church. The church continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. the homophobes and sexists are going to lose this fight.
those properties and those pensions belong to the episcopal church.

and that's just the deal -- they can go -- but without the property and without the pensions -- and they won't be missed.

change is good. -- or at least this change is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I hope so: but it looks like an big ugly technical brawl over § 57-9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes -- but i would guess that the episcopal church usa
has it so they are trustees -- or have on notice somehow that they own the property.

virgina is an old dioceses -- so i would guess -- but i don't know for certain that they didn't overlook that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not sure -- but I think the issue is thus: the VA statute strangely distinguishes
between "independent" churches (which dispose of property they use according to their bylaws) and the other churches, which are not governed according to the same rule, but which when a "division" occurs may apparently dispose of such property by a majority vote of the congregation

Off topic: I chatted with supernova recently: she wants to know why you haven't moved to NC yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. i wanna know why i haven't moved yet too!
the economy has been so slow that i have been afraid to put my place on the market -- i wanna move there so bad and have you all over for dinner and parties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. The question is the constitutionality of this Virginia law
within the constitution of Virginia. This depends a great deal on the judge's opinion, and his opinion can be appealed to the state supreme court, so this may not be finished regardless of which way the decision goes.

My basic read of Judge Randy Bellows is that he is very biased towards the breakaway congregations. He clearly exaggerates the case in his brief.

Any decision is Virginia is limited to Virginia, too. It does not set precedent, good or bad, for other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC