Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

African bishops denounce Mugabe's intimidation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:32 PM
Original message
African bishops denounce Mugabe's intimidation
Durham, Jun. 26, 2008 (CWNews.com) - The Catholic bishops of Southern Africa have denounced the political violence in Zimbabwe and called upon international leaders to help bring peace and democratic rule to that country.

"Sad to say politically based violence, intimidation and torture have made a fair and free second round of presidential elections impossible," said Cardinal Wilfrid Napier of Durham, South Africa, speaking in his capacity as president of the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference (SACBC). The bishops spoke out as Morgan Tsivangirai withdrew from the presidential race in Zimbabwe, citing the threats against his supporters.

A presidential run-off election that had pitted Tsivangirai against the incumbent, Robert Mugabe, has now "degenerated into a sham," the SACBC said. Opposition candidates have been harassed, intimidated, and denied access to the media; there supporters have been subjected to violence and intimidation, the bishops noted. The bishops said that the situation in Zimbabwe today is tantamount to a civil war-- but a war in which only one side, Mugabe's regime, is using violence against the other ...

The bishops urged international leaders not to recognize the legitimacy of the presidential election, which is now certain to produce a victory for Mugabe. Most international observers had agreed that Tsivangirai won a majority of the votes in the original election on March 29. But after a long delay, election officials announced on May 2 that Tsvangirai had won 47.9% of the vote, to 43.2% for Mugabe. Zimbabwe's law requires a runoff if no presidential candidate wins 50% of the votes.

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=59324
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. We had a family of Zimbabwean refugees in our old church.
They were originally from Greece, and he was a doctor. They didn't own any land, just their house, but they were forced to flee with only what they could carry when Mugabe turned everyone against all the whites. The dad would get tears in his eyes, he was so worried about his friends and patients. His kids were amazing kids, but they all had a haunted look in the backs of their eyes that said things had been worse than they told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Constructive Engagement was a failure in the 80's and it's still a failure
M'beki is being rightfully criticized for enabling Mugabe.

With recent criticisms by Nelson Mandela, M'beki is finding himself being more isolated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes I wonder if some of these African countries
weren't better off under colonialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It was colonialism that created artificial "countries" where there weren't any before
A lot of the trouble in Africa has come the Europeans taking ethnic groups that had been enemies for centuries and putting them in the same "country" by drawing arbitrary lines on a map. Sometimes the Europeans favored one ethnic group over another, leading to a sense of entitlement on the part of that group and resentments on the part of the others.

The Europeans made some improvements in infrastructure (for their benefit) and set up some schools and medical facilities (not nearly enough), but they lorded it over the indigenous people, took their resources, and gave very little back.

Note that Ethiopia, the only African country that was never under the thumb of any foreign power, is no worse off than most of the rest of the countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that gives context,
but it doesn't excuse Mugabe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Would have come out the same.
There'd have been lots of little countries with a few larger countries. The larger ones would have taken over some smaller ones and formed little mini-empires.

Then without some kind of assimilation, the usual ethnocentric arrogance we've come to expect would produce a privileged group and a lesser privileged group.

Bantu-speakers had no trouble oppressing the Khoei and San pre-colonialism. The Ethiopans had their own little empire. It would be little different from Europe or Asia: Iran's the remains of an empire, as are Thailand and Burma, where one ethnic group rules and the rest simmer.

Note that Ethiopa, the only African country that was never under the thumb of any foreign power, is also no better off than most of the rest of the countries.

Some stick out. Usually there are two tribes that could claim dominance, or more. Not very stable, that, unless they both settle down and work out their problems. But tribalism, whether in Pakistan or Zimbabwe, is hard to kill off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC