Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editorial: Betraying Vatican II (Jewish Daily Forward)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:41 PM
Original message
Editorial: Betraying Vatican II (Jewish Daily Forward)
Wed. Jan 28, 2009

When 2,200 bishops from around the world overwhelmingly adopted the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in October 1965, they transformed a relationship of animus and suspicion that had existed for centuries between the Roman Catholic Church and its Jewish forebears. Jews were no longer considered the killers of Jesus Christ. Catholics were no longer required to pray for Jewish conversion. The mighty Vatican condemned religious persecution and hatred, and called for “mutual respect and knowledge” between Catholics and Jews.

Even if it took years more for the historic fear and skepticism between Catholics and Jews to subside, Vatican II was a watershed moment. It was a powerful prelude to a growing dialogue that has continued for more than half a century. Two generations of Jews and Catholics have grown up being formally taught a different way of regarding one another. Acts of antisemitism no longer find justification in church teachings. It would be only a matter of time before a pope knelt in prayer at Auschwitz and left a personal message amid the ancient stones of the Western Wall.

Now this relationship of comfort and trust has been thrown in disarray by Pope Benedict XVI’s decision to revoke the excommunications of four schismatic bishops, including one who has denied the Holocaust. The four are members of the Society of St. Pius X, which rejected the Vatican II reforms and has, since its formation in 1970, been a sharp thorn in the side of a church that, especially under the current pope, values unanimity and cohesion. Jewish leaders, and many Catholics, have rightly decried the pope’s action, warning that the very future of Jewish-Catholic relations is at stake ...

http://www.forward.com/articles/15046/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ratzinger is desperately trying to drag the church back to the middle
ages. And JPII's stacked college of cardinals will happily help him.

Terrible developments for the RCC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly right. He even looks like he might enjoy a little Inquisition or Auto de Fe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He really is a dreadful little man. So sad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, he was the Grand Inquisitor prior to being poped.
http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dxcdf.html

July 1542 - Congregation for Universal Inquisition created
1908 - Name changed to "Congregation of the Holy Office"
1965 - Name changed to "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith"

Ratzinger was the Cardinal Prefect from 1981 until he was poped (can 'pope' be used as a verb?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Vatican daily clarifies scope and limits of lifting of Lefebvrists' excommunication
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 09:17 PM by struggle4progress
Rome, Jan 27, 2009 / 02:16 pm (CNA)

... The gesture of lifting the excommunication must be seen in light of the “conviction of the Council, an event inspired from on high,” the editorial stated. “The reform of the Council has not been completely implemented, but it is consolidated in such a way in the Catholic Church that it cannot enter into crisis over a magnanimous gesture of mercy, very much inspired in the new style of the Church desired by the Council that prefers the medicine of mercy to condemnation.”

The editorial goes on to point out that “the lifting of the excommunication that caused so many alarms does not end a painful path like that of the Lefebvrist schism. With this act the Pope clears the field of possible pretexts for infinite arguing, thus entering into the true problem: the full acceptance of the Magisterium, including obviously the Second Vatican Council. While it is true that the Catholic Church was not born at the Council, it is also true that the Church renewed by the Council is not another Church, but is the same Church of Christ, founded upon the Apostles, guaranteed by the successor of Peter and therefore a living part of the tradition. With the announcement of Pope John, tradition certainly did not disappear, but rather it continues today in the forms characteristic of a ministry and a Magisterium that have been updated by the great Council” ...

L’Osservatore Romano’s editorial concludes by addressing the issue of Bishop Richard Williamson’s recent statements about the Holocaust. Bishop Williamson, who was only brought back into communion with the Roman Catholic Church on January 25, made comments to a Swedish television station in which he said he did not believe that Jews were gassed to death by the Nazis.

After noting that the declaration “Nostra aetate” deplores “the hatred, persecution and all manifestations of anti-Semitism directed against the Jews of any time and by any person” and that this is “a teaching for Catholics that is not open to opinion,” L’Osservatore Romano said that the recent statements of denial by the British bishop “contradict this teaching and are therefore seriously grave and lamentable. Made known before the document lifting the excommunication, they are thus—as we have written—unacceptable.”

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14903


He's a pretty conservative Catholic but I don't think the Middle Ages represent the Pope's ideal. In the snippets above, the Vatican's newspaper is emphasizing that the Lefebvrists must accept Vatican II (which seems to be what they were originally upset about) and is calling holocaust denial unacceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. He did say he wanted a smaller Catholic Church
He's doing everything he can to make it happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC