Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In other news:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:45 PM
Original message
In other news:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. That D’Souza guy is completely out of touch with reality
Edited on Wed Feb-11-09 02:09 PM by cosmik debris
“Christianity brought these values into the world,” he argued, claiming that slavery was abolished in Christian societies between the fourth and tenth centuries.


Has he never even heard of Mississippi? Is he completely unfamiliar with our Civil War? What planet is he from? And why did it take 4 to 10 centuries for the good christian societies to come around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not only that, but what Christian societies abolished slavery in that time?
Rome was a Christian society by that point and they were big into keeping slaves. Slavery was so widespread in Europe that the Church felt the need to repeatedly outlaw selling Christian slaves to non-Christian areas. Of course they had no issue with the African slave trade. Hell, Pope Nicholas V issued a papal bull encouraging the slave trade as a way to remove non-Christians from their native lands, allowing for easy conquest.

As usual all D'Souza can do to make his case is obfuscate the truth and fabricate lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can we atheists elect a new public representative?
Why is it always Hitchens invited to these things to represent the Voice of Atheism?

Of course, I think I know the answer, or at least part of it: Hitchens is more controversial, especially with that book title of his, "God Is Not Great", Hitchens' questionable sobriety is (for some) entertaining, and perhaps it's easier for people not fond of the idea of atheism to find him annoying and dismiss him because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC