Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court gives Santeria priest OK to sacrifice goats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 03:59 PM
Original message
Court gives Santeria priest OK to sacrifice goats
Edited on Sat Aug-01-09 04:05 PM by moobu2
DALLAS — A federal appeals court reversed a lower court's ruling on Friday that barred a Santeria priest from sacrificing goats in his Texas home, saying a city's decision to prohibit the ritual violated the man's religious rights.

Jose Merced, 46, accuses the city of Euless, Texas, of trampling on his constitutional right to religious exercise. The city claims the sacrifices jeopardize public health and violate its slaughterhouse and animal cruelty ordinances.

Last year, U.S. District Judge John McBryde sided with the Fort Worth suburb and dismissed the Puerto Rico native's claims. Merced appealed.

In its ruling, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said the Euless ordinance placed a substantial burden on Merced's "free exercise of religion without advancing a compelling governmental interest using the least restrictive means."

"It's a great day for religious freedom in Texas," said Eric Rassbach, Merced's lawyer, in response to the three-judge panel's ruling.

Merced said by practicing his faith in the privacy of his own home, he didn't harm anyone.


LinK


(edited to fix link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's harming the goat. What will be next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. what's next ? human sacrifice ?
the US has never understood the separation of Church and State
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does he feed his family...
...with the goat after the sacrifice?
If so, I don't have a problem with this.

I saw a Santeria chicken sacrifice many years ago, and they killed the chicken quickly and ate it for dinner.
Much better than the chickens you buy in the supermarket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i think they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've got news for everyone involved -- the Muslims have been doing this in the US for decades.
OH NOES! Run for the hills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just think about it, using these asshole judge's logic....
...if Michael Vick (or his attorney) had had the sense to offer a legal defense that said he wasn't forcing dogs to fight one another to the death to win gambling bets, but was actually exercising his form of worship -- which just happens to involve forcing dogs to fight one another to the death, then he would have gotten off Scot-free.

- So it would seem that it's okay to make religions follow our laws involving monogamous marriages (particularly when involving the raping of "young wives"). But not our health and safety laws. Somehow it all makes perfect religious sense.......

/:sarcasm:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is the perfect thread for my 666th post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. How's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-02-09 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Paging PETA... time to declare holy
war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-02-09 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Poor goat. How unfortunate to be penned up and then killed because some nitwit believes in bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm fine with religious freedom. It's a privileged status for religion that bothers me.
Either all of us should get to sacrifice goats at home without regard for animal protection laws and health codes, for whatever personal reasons we might have, or none of us should.

That someone labels an idea floating around in his head "religion" shouldn't give it any more or less standing before the law than any other kind of idea.

The only proper basis, as far as I'm concerned, for granting someone a religious exemption from following the same law everyone else has to follow is if it can be proved that a law was designed specifically to interfere with known religious practices, e.g. if an anti-Catholic group pushed through a law against the consumption of unleavened bread, with no clear legitimate state interest being served by such a law, deliberately designing the law to interfere with Catholic communion services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChadwickHenryWard Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Absolutely correct.
Beautfully reasoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. He harmed the goat
Edited on Mon Aug-03-09 09:13 AM by Meshuga
"Merced said by practicing his faith in the privacy of his own home, he didn't harm anyone."

Well, he harmed the goat just to dispose of it. It would be a different story if the religious ceremony had him killing the animal in a humane way to use it for food. The authorities should enforce the existing laws against animal cruelty if an infraction took place. Religious reasons should not be an excuse to exempt anyone. Having one standard for everyone is the best approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good
That is my understanding of the 1st Amendment. And people complaining about the goat? Come talk to me when we make hunting illegal. Until that happens, not letting this guy do this is just racism and good old fashioned "my religion is the one that the 1st Amendment refers to, not yours."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC