Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cherie Blair gives lenient sentence because the criminal is "a religious person"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:44 PM
Original message
Cherie Blair gives lenient sentence because the criminal is "a religious person"
Mrs Blair, a devout Roman Catholic who sits as a part time judge under the title Cherie Booth QC, spared Shamso Miah from jail last month after he was convicted of assaulting a person at a bank queue in east London.
...
In response the National Secular Society made an official objection to the Judicial Complaints Office which handles complaints against members of the judiciary. Last night the OJC said the complaint was being “considered under the Judicial Discipline Regulations”. If it finds that Mrs Blair may have breached those regulations, a senior judge would then be brought in to investigate and could recommend formal disciplinary action.
...
CCTV captured Mr Miah punching Mr Furcan in the face before running out the bank. When Mr Furcan followed him to demand why he had been hit, Mr Miah lashed out again knocking Mr Furcan to the pavement and breaking his jaw.
...
“I am going to suspend this sentence for the period of two years based on the fact you are a religious person and have not been in trouble before,” she said. “You caused a mild fracture to the jaw of a member of the public standing in a queue at Lloyds Bank. You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/secular-society-upset-by-judge-cherie-decision-1889792.html


Notice that "the liberal Christian think-tank Ekklesia" agrees with the NSS about this.

Of course, her husband is "a religious person" too ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. A truly "religious person" wouldn't have committed assault in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. So only non-religious people commit assault? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Apparently.
I guess the overwhelming majority of incarcerated felons aren't religious people despite their own self-identification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What were the factors that she used to determine he was a religous person?
Does she think that George Washington was a religious person? Even though he was not a communicant and later on refused to attend services.

What are the requirements? If a Muslim must one make a journey to Mecca? Or just profess one's faith?

If a Catholic must one make a trip to Rome and kiss the Pope's wrinkly finger? Or just attend church during the holidays?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. FWIW, he had just come from a mosque when his assaulted the man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. To me that suggests the person's religion doesn't stay with him when he leaves the service.
That his religion is only important to him when he within the sanctuary of his religion. Anything goes when he leaves that sanctuary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just like Huckabee! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. If a person's.....
...religiosity is to be taken into account in criminal judgments, then the punishment should be harsher for the Christian, shouldn't it? If religious people are supposedly so much more moral than the rest of us, then no quarter should be given when judging for violation(s) of their precepts.

- Obviously a good Christian had to have know better. Right?

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. How nice.
What a pantload.

"You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour."

There's so much bigotry wrapped up in that statement I'm simply speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC