Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vatican Bioethics Official Refuses To Resign After Defending Abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:30 AM
Original message
Vatican Bioethics Official Refuses To Resign After Defending Abortion
Renato Fisichella, Vatican Bioethics Official, Refuses To Resign After Defending Abortion

Huffington Post | NICOLE WINFIELD | 02/22/10 07:08 PM | AP



VATICAN CITY — The Vatican's top bioethics official on Monday dismissed calls for his resignation following an uproar over his defense of doctors who aborted the twin fetuses of a 9-year-old child who was raped by her stepfather. Monsignor Renato Fisichella told The Associated Press he refused to respond to five members of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy for Life who questioned his suitability to lead the institution.

Fisichella wrote an article in the Vatican's newspaper in March saying the Brazilian doctors didn't deserve excommunication as mandated by church law because they were saving the girl's life. The call for mercy sparked heated criticism from some academy members who said it implied the Vatican was opening up to so-called "therapeutic abortion" to save the mother's life.

To quiet their complaints, the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a clarification in July, repeating the Catholic Church's firm opposition to abortion and saying Fisichella's words had been "manipulated and exploited."

But that didn't stem the criticism, which boiled up again last week when the academy – an advisory body to the pope made up of lay and religious bioethics experts from around the world – held its annual plenary assembly. Five members of the 145-odd member body issued a statement Feb. 16, at the end of the closed meeting, again questioning Fisichella's suitability for office.

They took him to task for his opening speech, in which he described the criticism over his article as being motivated by spite, according to participants. And they accused him of manipulating the Vatican's July clarification to make it appear that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith had vindicated his original article.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/23/renato-fisichella-vatican_n_472928.html">MORE

- The old DeSwiss would be cursing up a storm about now. Yeah, he'd be saying how these old doddering reprobates need to be horse-whipped for trying to justify their moldy religious bullshit at the expense of a 9-year old girl's life. And how they're so fucking out of touch with reality, that the lot of them should be locked-up in an insane asylum.

Yeah, that's what the old DeSwiss might have said. But the new DeSwiss is much more sensitive and tolerant. See???

==============================================================================
DeSwiss


http://www.atheisttoolbox.com/">The Atheist Toolbox






"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent,
persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." ~ John F. Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, good for DeSwiss.
But what about DeGerman? Ain't he still Pope? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura902 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Love that JFK quote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. "saying the Brazilian doctors didn't deserve excommunication"
Wow, that is a lot of doctors to excommunicate.



couldn't resist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. More proof that its not the sanctity of life that they defend
Its the sanctity of their church law. Fucking hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, those 5 complaing bishops do not know what compassion is
This was a Catch 22 situation and very unusual. A cold interpretation of the rules is the last thing that is needed. Asking for compassion is not the same as going against dogma in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC