Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Must God and His Prophet Be Male?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:03 PM
Original message
Why Must God and His Prophet Be Male?
This is one thing I've never understood about the holy books. Why is it that the Almighty just happens to be male? Same with his prophets? Jesus and Mohammad and all the major figures in the holy books. Versus female or even non-gendered in the case of God himself?

The skeptical part of me says its just the result of the male-dominated society of the time who invented them. But maybe there's more going on than meet's the eye?

I'd appreciate people's opinions on this matter.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. God clearly doesn't have to be.
The gender assumptions about The Messiah and The Prophet were based on the fact that, by virtually all accounts, they were male in their earthly incarnations.

At least as I understand it.

Mind you, we don't even know for sure if the latter two DID exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "we don't even know for sure if the latter two DID exist"
We do not know if god exists

And who is the Prophet you speak of??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Fair enough...we don't know that God exists.
For what it's worth to you, by The Prophet, I meant Muhammad. My assumption is that that is who the OP was referring to by using the term(which is usually only capitalized and singular when referring to Muhammad, at least in my awareness).

You and I aren't actually having a disagreement here, just so you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Through rational disagreement comes understanding
I thought that is what you meant, I was just making sure.

I believe that Muhammad did have at least one wife and the one I am thinking of was a property holder. So in that regard Islam is more progressive than the christian churches.

What I find funny is that the christian right is always complaining on how everyone is attacking the traditional family. Whereas the god that they believe in does not have any females in any part of their family. Yes, Mary did give birth, but she was not part god's family. She was part of man's family. So does the right only believe in families made up of men??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Well.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Well, even in a more traditional understanding,
the third part of the trinity was sometimes thought of as female... "Sophia" - wisdom - the Holy Spirit... And in the Roman C. tradition, the position of Mary is quite important and highlighted. Of course, it's often her submissiveness that's celebrated.

But yes, the absence of a strong female figure is off-putting - but just a reflection of the men who dominated the religion(s). They saw it, and formed the faiths, from their own very biased perspectives. Women weren't important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because they come from patriarchal societies dominated by men.
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 11:32 PM by Ozymanithrax
And God "He vould have an enormous Shwanstooker!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. it wasn't always so, first we had female deities along with male
but them apparently the high testosterone crowd got the upper hand and our goddesses were regulated to history and they became male. And then males became superior to women and then men became the only people who could own property including their women. Women went from being revered for the fact that they could bear children to being brood mares for the next generation. And they wonder why women are feminists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agreed. It was an organized plan to replace the worship of goddesses,
who had "equal time" in Greek and Roman mythologies. You took Hera (Power), Athena (Wisdom), Aphrodite (Love), and Demeter (Crops) VERY seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Read Riane Eisler's "The Chalice and the Blade"
Eisler presents a pretty compelling narrative of this process of replacing female and gender-balanced deity systems with the male-dominant paradigm we have today.

I think that religious structures mirror the social situation. Something about the development of agriculture (possibly the strength required to use a ox-drawn plow) gave men social dominance, and religion changed/was changed to reflect that. Once a religious system is in place it is always used by the hierarchy to reinforce their position, resulting in the social control feedback loop we're all familiar with.

So a male hierarchy worshiping a male deity in a male-dominated society becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks, I will take your suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Exactly.
Here's a few more sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_God_Was_a_Woman">When God Was a Woman

http://free-ebook-download.org/When-God-Was-a-Woman.html">When God Was A Woman -- FREE PDF eBook downloads


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just a coincidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Which god are you referring to?
My god is not gender based.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Many depictions of the FSM...
...feature two large balls, and there are those "noodly appendages" as well, but I can't rule out the FSM being hermaphroditic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Ovaries are round, too, ya know.
Who says they have to be internal?:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Abrahamic god is hermaphroditic.
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

If you figure "man" is plural, as in 'mankind,' you have the Abrahamic god creating both men and women in it's image. The reason for referring to this god as a 'him' can then be attributed to patriarchal tradition.

Maybe saying "sky daddy" is incorrect, and should instead be "sky hermaphrodite." Not as catchy, but probably more theologically accurate. Maybe our resident theologian could chime in, though I don't expect that he will, other than to say that everyone's wrong and leave.

I do know from my own Jewish upbringing, that the sky hermaphrodite is supposed to have both male and female forms. There's a part of the weekly Shabbat service that involves welcoming in the (invisible) Sabbath bride/queen (depending on the sect/temple/rabbi) who's a feminine form of the Abrahamic god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Perhaps for the other "Abrahamic" religions but not in Judaism
The Jewish concept is neither male or female. It has no gender. "Creating" male and female in his/her/its likeness has nothing to do with physical attributes in Judaism. I think it is a way to give humans a special status like humans having the intellect to aid in deision making (for good or bad) and be "godlike," whatever that means.

Shabbat queen/bride has nothing to do with god or other supernatural beings either. It is just a Jewish tradition anthropomorphizing the arrival of shabbat since all sorts of special preparations are done to welcome the sabbath. You know, people prepare their houses and their tables for shabbat as if they were waiting for a queen/bride.

There are different names of God used in Jewish texts and tradition in the masculine form. But there is "Shekhinah" which is a feminine name for God. Regardless, it does not define the gender for a Jewish God. Jewish tradition rejects any definition of attributes for God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. My bad. Thanks for the correction. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Hi Meshuga
I'm not sure there's a whole lot of difference between God being envisaged as having no gender or both genders... either way, it makes it more difficult for humans to quickly categorize and limit the divine.

Or I think so, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yup
I think this got squashed out during the formation of Christianity, during times in which women were pushed aside, and certainly not given much voice in religious or political arenas. The early church mothers were all put papered over, and it was all about men. That includes the way God was talked about and imaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well, not all...
there are some women who figure in religious texts and scriptures.

But that said, I think the answer is as simple as this: the guys wrote the books. In their view, men were all that mattered, and women were fortunate if they were viewed as anything more than chattel. The scriptures of our major religions have most certainly been formed on the worldview and biases of the men who wrote, edited and translated them over the years. So yes, as you say, male-dominated society creates scriptures that reflect their view.

Likewise with the perception that God is a "he". There's plenty of "father" thrown around, but really, no basis to assign a gender to God. God is. God is both/neither genders. But human beings - men - look at male as the gender default. And someone as powerful as God must of course be male in their view.

I think we'll eventually grow beyond that perception, but I'm often surprised at how strongly held it still is. I had a bit of a back and forth a couple of months ago on the topic at adult ed at my church. One very nice man was quite honestly shocked when I said that God was not a he or a she. But, but, but, he sputtered, the bible says "father" and "He"! His idea of God was very strongly and literally formed from the way he read the bible. Even the idea that God didn't conform to his expectations was hard for him to handle. The women there had no difficulty at all with the idea, however!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. I consider being a God and male at the same time...
...very much like being invisible and pink at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Isn't it amazing that before Monothesim
There were goddesses. Greek, Roman, Norse, Hindu, Wiccan, and a few others.. Make it one god and its easy for them to eliminate the female side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. They weren’t all men
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 05:39 PM by left is right
If I recall correctly there was Deborah in the book of judges.
There was a woman in the times of the later kings that authenticated the words of Moses and brought revival to the nation of Judah (don’t remember her name but I think it started with an H)
There was Anna who greeted the Baby Jesus in the Temple
And Paul, mentioned a few Dorcas? And there was the wife in a husband/wife duo that worked side by side with Paul (Saphira?) It was thought that the book of Hebrews was written by the H/W team
Women didn’t get books named for them but they were there.


(just looked it up it was Priscilla not Saphira) but the Book of the Hebrews still might have been written by Priscilla and Aquilla no one knows for sure)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sta au Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. I could have sworn...
that there were plenty of monotheistic religions where the one that taught the people how to live were hermaphrodites. Since just one gender was too much of a confinement for a god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. My Roman Catholic priest friend describes God as He, She, It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. Don't forget the prominence of Mary in Catholicism.
The reverence for Mary in the Christian West, and continuing to the present day in Latin America, was extraordinary. She is venerated by Eastern Christians, but no as strongly and not in the same way as in Western Christianity. Interestingly, this extreme level of the veneration of Mary started not too long before the explosion of troubadour love songs and tales of courtly love. Then there was the powerful, respected nuns like Hildegard von Bingam, who often took the Pope to task.

there seems to be a Feminist strain in Western Civilization that goes very far back, perhaps to the Celts and Ancient Germanic peoples. Compared to them and to the Medieval west the Ancient Greeks were like the Taliban when it came to women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. This was all sorted out in the 3rd century.........
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 02:58 AM by dimbear
Romans could chose at will whether God was male or female, by signing up with Isis or Mithras or whomever. It just looked more profitable to the powers that be that their subjects sign up with Jesus. After that high- level decision, and the subsequent banning of the opposition, a little slaughter did the trick. It's in the book.

edit: 3rd and 4th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. The menfolk like their fairy tales that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. Probably true of the Abrahamic religion, but not of some others

Hinduism, and some forms of Buddhism do have Goddesses. and visualize god(if they ever do..as many different schools have different philosophies....and some hindu schools dont have a god at all) as both male and female...or as something that transcends such human-centric limitations.

in fact...if i remember correctly, the largest Hindu temple in India is that of the "Fish eyed (green) goddess" , Meenakshi.
Its been there for nearly 2500 years and was even mentioned in the travelogues of the Greek and Roman merchants who visited that place.

http://www.travelintelligence.com/travel-writing/court-fish-eyed-goddess-queen



http://www.view360.in/virtualtour/madurai/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC