Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With charity for some? Illinois court rejects Catholic agency’s ‘right’ to discriminate with public

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 07:24 PM
Original message
With charity for some? Illinois court rejects Catholic agency’s ‘right’ to discriminate with public
We’ve had a welcome slew of court victories for church-state separation as of late.

Most recently, a state court in Illinois has rejected a lawsuit brought by Catholic Charities. The Catholic agency wanted to continue receiving government contracts for adoption services but still discriminate by refusing to place children with couples in civil unions.

This became a particularly heated issue back in June when Illinois granted same-sex couples the right to form civil unions and, therefore, the right to jointly adopt.

The Catholic hierarchy didn’t like the new law, and several Illinois dioceses threatened to stop providing adoption services if they had comply with it.

State officials didn’t seem to mind, though. They simply informed Catholic Charities that the agency’s contract to provide foster care and adoption services would not be renewed. The state said Catholic Charities was in violation of the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act because the agency would not provide adoption and foster care services to couples in civil unions.

Losing the contract meant a loss of $30 million in state funds for the Catholic group. Outraged, the dioceses of Springfield, Peoria and Joliet sued the state, arguing that they have property rights to renew the contract. But on Friday, Sangamon County Circuit Judge John Schmidt denied that request – holding that the state was within its rights.

http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/2011/08/23/illinois-court-rejects-catholic-charities-lawsuit-over-same-sex-couples/

----------------------------------------------

And ANOTHER 1st Amendment WIN!!!
Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd to zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
seeviewonder Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I recced to make up for the person who likes
to discriminate. Trollllll....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another rec, still 0.
I can't fucking believe that anyone would be in favor of allowing taxpayer money to fund discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Oh but...
If you don't allow them to discriminate against Teh Gays you're discriminating against them!1!1 How dare you expect them to follow the same laws as everyone else? It's religious persecution!1!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Cognitive dissonance. The RCC represent all that is good and holy,
yet the RCC does some really nasty shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Therefore, really nasty shit is good and holy.
All the more reason to reject it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Church officials - But that $30 million is ours!
Oh, and of course, we love the orphans and want to see them adopted or whatever...

I'm glad other agencies are stepping up to handle the caseloads. The Catholic Church doesn't deserve any kind of victory in this - not even a, "See, we told you so," one if they proved difficult to replace.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. There's always been BIG MONEY in BABIES....especially pale ones.
And of course, if you can place them with a CATHOLIC family, then they've got themselves the "gift that keeps on giving." They'll pull the "guilt string" at every opportunity. It's like a "Forever Shakedown!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Similar issues are going on in the UK
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC