Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hearing Robert Putnam on the puzzle of American religion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:40 PM
Original message
Hearing Robert Putnam on the puzzle of American religion
Travis Scholl STLtoday.com | Posted: Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:30 pm

Last night, I heard Robert Putnam, America's foremost social scientist, speak at Washington University on his latest research into American religion. His recent book, American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us, is quickly becoming a definitive study on the subject. And his insights burst almost all the preconceived notions of what it means to be religious in America.

At the heart of Putnam's investigation (and his lecture) is what he calls the "puzzle" of American religion: How can America be simultaneously religiously devout, religiously diverse, and religiously tolerant, when history says these three social ingredients don't mix?

Coming out of the most religiously observant decade of American history, the 1950s, Putnam observed that we witnessed two seismic shocks in American public life. First, the social and political upheaval of the 1960s, during which time religious observance plummeted. Second, the social counterreaction to the 1960s that eventually coalesced in the Religious Right of the 1980s. (Although Putnam was adamant to note that this counterreaction began as a social and moral movement and not a political one.)

One of the striking realities to come out of this convulsive upheaval is that where previously religious identification did not correlate with political identification (in the 50s, you could find just as many Republicans as Democrats sitting next to you in the pew on Sunday morning), now people will change their religion to fit their politics, and not vice versa. Given the "stakes" of both religious and political belief, this is remarkably counterintuitive.

http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/civil-religion/travis-scholl/article_e320b154-0649-11e1-a551-001a4bcf6878.html
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eternal damnation is a big risk, but does avoiding change serve to minimize the risk?
Given the "stakes" of both religious and political belief, this is remarkably counterintuitive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC