|
More broadly, does repackaging the theology of creation - whatever the religion - in scientific terminology undermine the role of faith in society?
From the days of the Renaissance, religion and science have shared a wary path in the world of men. Sometimes bloodied and at odds, sometimes joined in the big debates of the time, both have influenced where we are today.
Obviously, politics and religion are old friends. Copernicus and Galileo were as much a threat to the Divine Right of Kings as they were to established religious dogma. Popes routinely influenced political events far beyond the Papal State.
All were eventually challenged from within and without. And benefited from the debate.
And over time, these two aspects of public and private life came to a somewhat uneasy, but beneficial truce. There are plenty of exceptions to the generalization, but both grew to play complimentary and beneficial roles in society.
And both held an independent place.
The Intelligent Design campaign - if that is what it is - has blurred the big picture. It intentionally politicizes religion on the assumption that science has broken that long, beneficial truce. It assumes a battle where there is none.
More importantly, perhaps, it abandons its own raison d'etre, which is faith, in a short sighted effort to "beat" science at its own game.
Faith is the realm of religion - not science. Those that repackage their religious belief in scientific language, and set it in political terms, seem to damn their own faith with faint praise.
|