Jason Campbell to the Raiders??? WTF!!

madinmaryland

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 03:49 PM
Original message

Jason Campbell to the Raiders??? WTF!!

Well kind of expected, but I hope that Jason gets more wins than he did with the douchebags in DC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MadBadger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message

1. Hmm, you should reread Skinner's post that you always tell us to read.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=215&topic_id=135686&mesg_id=135686

Correct term is Washington Redskins.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

madinmaryland

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. Uhh. I did not refer to them as the "deadskins" so I am ok.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

KamaAina

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message

2. Works for me.

The problem up at Hegenberger Rd. is clearly JaMarcus. After he got benched, they actually started to play decent football behind Bruce Gradkowski! Then, with absolute predictability, he went down...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mix

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. So is JaMarcus Russell a bust? nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

KamaAina

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #4

6. A 48DDD one.

EPIC FAIL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

madinmaryland

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #6

9. Put your excitement away, cboy!

:hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Arkana

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-26-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6

11. Problem with JaMarcus is that he got paid.

And now he doesn't give a fuck about football.

Personally, if someone gave me 30 million dollars in guaranteed money I'd be hard-pressed to care about football too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Auggie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-26-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #11

12. $39 million, when all is said and done

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=215x145317

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Auggie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #4

7. Two reported issues on Russell:

One: The guy hasn't shown much diligence for learning the offense or preparation. It takes 110%, not 90.

Two: Weight and lack of conditioning.

I'll speculate that Russell is a naturally gifted athlete whose size and strength is enough for succeeding at the college level. But not the pros. It takes more dedication than Russell has yet shown.

So yeah, he's been a bust.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

joeybee12

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-26-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7

13. If I recall correctly, he showed up at the NFL camp right before the draft

out of shape...sent off alarm bells, but the Raiders apparently didn't hear those.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Auggie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-26-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #13

14. "I do realize that you did not want to draft JaMarcus Russell..."

"He is a great player. Get over it and coach this team on the field; that is what you were hired to do. We can win with this team!"
- from Al Davis' letter to the soon-to-be-fired Lane Kiffin, Sept. 12, 2008

:rofl:

Reported by Gwen Knapp of the San Francisco Chronicle, 4-25-10:

LINK: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/25/SPPM1D43J9.DTL#ixzz0mE0K7heB

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

joeybee12

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-26-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #14

15. "The man could get hurt tying his shoes"

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Va Lefty

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message

5. skins and eagles will both regret ditching their qbs

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MadBadger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-24-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5

8. Why?

I could understand one of them regretting it, but both of them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Va Lefty

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Apr-25-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #8

10. eagles cause they have to play skins twice a year

skins cause McNabb is only a short term answer 2-3 years. I think Jason Campbell will be a good qb for much longer

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 06th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.