Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Total dominance in men's vs women's tennis.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:00 AM
Original message
Total dominance in men's vs women's tennis.

Take a look at the number of grand slams won by the greatest male and female tennis players of all time:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_statistics#Most_Grand_Slam_singles_titles_.28all_time.29

In the following table, the first column is number of grand slam titles, and the subsequent columns are number of competitors in that category who have won at least that many titles.

N Mx1 Wx1 Mx2 Wx2
24 0 1 0 0
22 0 2 0 0
20 0 2 0 2
19 0 3 0 2
18 0 5 0 2
14 1 5 0 3
13 2 5 0 3
12 3 6 1 3
11 5 6 2 4
10 6 7 4 5
9 6 9 4 5
8 11 11 4 7
7 19 16 8 8
6 25 21 10 10
5 28 29 17 12
4 35 34 26 20
3 51 46
2 74 54


Now, this doesn't tell us anything at all about the relative abilities of male and female tennis players, because all the men were competing against men and vice versa.

But what is very striking is that there have been several more female players much better than any of their competition than there have been male players, both in singles and doubles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Or it tells you something about how long they can maintain dominance
which might be connected to the length of games. A five set match is physically very hard (and I'll stick my neck out and say a five set match is harder for men than a three set match for women), so the men's game will depend more on players being at their physical peak, meaning there's a quicker turnover of the top players. Certainly, players like Navratilova and King kept their careers going a long time.

For your idea of "much better than any of their competition", I think you should look at their dominance in a particular year (or maybe a couple of years) - how many times someone has one all 4 grand slam titles, 3 of them and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good point.
The link I gave lists years between first and last win, and they're certainly often longer for women than for men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Women's tennis, like most women's sports, is relatively new in
regards to how seriously it has been taken as a sport, that is changing, and I doubt you're gonna see a woman dominate like the way Martina or Chris did, and that's good for the sport. Even when they were playing, the game had changed drastically...Margaret Court Smith has 25 Grand Slams, but the most are from the Australian, when it was pretty much onl australians who played in it...you couldn't just fly in for a couple weeks and play...it was a big deal to get there. Chris only played in 4 Australians, winning 2.

Also, there are more opportunities for women tennis players...look at all the endorsements and options that keep them unfocused on the game. Did Billie Jean King have those options, 35-40 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC