It's official..Stanford Women Get Screwed...

...how Duke got a #1 above them amazes me...other than that, no real surprises.

Stanford is the #2 ranked team in the nation, won the Pac 10 tourney easily...how can the selection committee possibly justify this?

The coeds may be promiscuous, but that is over the top. :sarcasm:

After the first game they will have to beat Rutgers, a 19-12 team, at Rutgers home gym and then beat Oklahoma at fucking Oklahoma to advance. For a Number 2 seed with at 29-3 record, this is pathetic.

The NCAA is all about money and taking care of their sacred cows. Stanford and Auburn are not, as George Carlin would say, members of the fucking club.

the weakness of the Pac-10 this year. They only got three teams in the tournament this year and only won 65% of their non-conf games. Whereas the ACC got six teams in and won 80% in non-conf.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter all that much because if they advance to the Sweet 16, Stanford will have a huge "home-court" advantage. I would much rather be a two seed and play at "home" than be a one seed playing 2200 miles from home like Duke.

I hardly think that's justification enough for disrespecting the #2 team in the country. This is all about kissing Duke's ass.

In the the things that do carry weight Duke is better on seven of ten (with one tie)


Record Duke 26-5 Stanford 29-4

RPI Duke 5 Stanford 9

Schedule Strength Duke 6 Stanford 30 (playing UW-188, WSU-207 OR-173 twice each killed them)

Wins against RPI top50 Duke 11 Stanford 6

Wins against RPI top25 Duke 7 Stanford 3

Wins against RPI top10 Duke 3 Stanford 0

Road wins against top 50 Duke 2 Stanford 1

Neutral site wins against top50 Duke 2 Stanford 2

Record against common opponents Duke 2-0 (USC and Tenn) Stanford 3-1 (USC 3 wins Tenn loss)

Last 10 Duke 7-3 (Losses to MD (RPI 3) 2x and UNC (RPI 11) Stanford 10-0