Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Youth-Smoking Ads May Have Opposite Effect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 09:40 AM
Original message
Anti-Youth-Smoking Ads May Have Opposite Effect
Surprise!

The surest way to get teenagers to do something is to tell them not to.

That principle appears to apply to some smoking-prevention ads created by tobacco companies, a new study has found.

Youngsters 12 to 17 were less likely to see smoking as harmful and had stronger intentions to smoke after the airing of television ads that urged parents to talk to their children about not lighting up, according to the study to be published in December in the American Journal of Public Health. The slogan of the national campaign, begun in 1999 by cigarette industry leader Philip Morris USA, was "Talk. They'll listen."

Researchers gauged the effect of the ads by analyzing television ratings from 75 U.S. media markets and data from an annual national survey of eighth-, 10th- and 12th-graders from 1999 to 2002.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/31/AR2006103101158.html

:rofl:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, who da' thunk? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've read they studied all the Just Say No stuff from the 80's
And everything they found that did not work, they developed their teen-smoking campaigns using those ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. The ads were offered up by the tobacco companies as part of the
tobacco suit -- they were to fund anti-smoking ads. But the ads are worse than useless. Parents who talk to their kids will talk about smoking, and be ignored. Parents who don't talk to their kids are not going to be influenced to do so by the ads. The ads are subliminally directly targetting kids, not targetting parents at all -- do they show the parent in the majority of the shots, or the kids (or the BAD kids) smoking? Bad kids smoke. Bad kids are cool. Cool kids smoke.

The quickest way to reduce smoking would be to eliminate ALL advertising, pro and con. TV, magazine, billboard, posters, everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC