Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Good News Is The "Rubber Rooms" Are Closing. The Bad News Is That Teacher Due Process

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:56 PM
Original message
The Good News Is The "Rubber Rooms" Are Closing. The Bad News Is That Teacher Due Process
In The 3020-a Process Remains Unchanged



According to this blogger, and I have no reason to doubt him, just because the rubber rooms will be gone doesn't mean the "due process" targeted teachers in NYC will be any more fair:



Unfair Investigations:

There are no changes to how investigations are done. When a Principal goes after a teacher the final result is the teacher is removed. I have previously wrote about these unfair investigations Here, Here, and Here. An independent investigator would make this a fairer investigation and would require the teacher to fully participate in it.

No Consequences For "False Accusations":

The agreement does nothing to ensure that either the DOE or UFT go after administrators or students that were found to have given "false accusations" against a teacher, despite language to do just that in the previous "rubber room agreement". To date, no Administrator has been disciplined for giving "false accusations" against a teacher.

The Expansion Of The Hated & Unfair "Probable Cause" Provisions:

The awful "probable cause" provision was expanded to include violent assault. Despite Leo Casey's advocacy for this provision, mere hearsay is enough to get a teacher offline for up to three months. Now we are adding another accusation to remove more innocent teachers.

Shortening The 3020-a Hearing Process:

You might think that this is a good thing. However, there is real concern that the hearings, with their stringent timelines could pressure Arbitrators from hearing character witnesses for the teacher because of the requirement of meeting the timelines (teacher witnesses go last). The hasty hearing process may turn out to be unfair to the teacher.



More from Chaz's School Daze

Administrators do any thing they damned well please. If they want you out, they will find a way or make up a way to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. >>If they want you out, they will find a way or make up a way to do it.
Under the current system, that's the case for *any* job, unless you (hollow laugh) have a good union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The trouble of course is that this is a LEGAL proceeding,
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 07:13 PM by tonysam
and school districts are SUPPOSED to abide by the law. Taxpayers are financing these tribunals. However, they do not follow the law; if the district administrators are in trouble, they just rig the damned hearings knowing few teachers have the financial means to appeal these administrative--not civil--proceedings.

I know this firsthand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh yeah, same here
Edited on Wed Apr-21-10 05:49 PM by tbyg52
They published all these "guidelines," but then they rig them any way they want.

Edited for typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC