Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting example(s) of how famous LGBT people are "hetero-normalized".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 07:07 PM
Original message
Interesting example(s) of how famous LGBT people are "hetero-normalized".

Hetero-normalizing David Hockney

Last May I noted that most obituaries of Robert Rauschenberg 'forgot' that he was gay, and I explained why that was an important omission: Rauschenberg was on the vanguard of what was then called gay liberation, he was on the vanguard of gay migration from rural areas to cities and his work frequently addressed homosexuality and equality in a direct way that artists before had not. I wrote that the coverage of Rauschenberg's death "hetero-normalized" him.

In a Sunday feature already posted online, the New York Times and free-lancer Carol Kino have unfortunately hetero-normalized David Hockney. According to Kino: "In 2005 Mr. Hockney -- temporarily, he says -- left Hollywood, where he had lived full time since 1978, to transform the manicured green and golden slopes, woods and farmland of the East Yorkshire landscape into spare, quickly worked compositions charged with pink, orange and violet."

That's not true. Hockney did not leave California because the East Yorkshire landscape romantically called him home to England. Hockney left because the United States government would not allow his partner, John Fitzherbert, back into the country. In order to be with Fitzherbert, Hockney returned to the UK.

Even if Kino's error is one of what she and/or the NYT thinks is one of benign omission, it's not. America's discriminatory policies have driven away of the post-war era's most prominent artists -- someone who chose to live here because he loved being in America and who enriched the cultural life of our nation. America's treatment of Hockney, his partner and other men and women who have had to confront a similar circumstance, is a point of national shame, not a meaningless detail to be quietly dismissed.

From Modern Art Notes (10/16/09).


I wanted to share this in order that others might understand how gay lives and history are made invisible. It happens all the time -- please feel free to add your own examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've seen this happen on very personal levels too
Edited on Fri Oct-16-09 07:18 PM by FreeState
When my partner's Mom passed away everyones spouse was listed on the Obituary except me. Often when some family members introduce us he is just a friend. At a family reunion this year he was referred to "that guy that comes with uncle FreeState". I have some family members that include him as my spouse in everything they do and celebrate who I am. Then there are the others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you.
Someone I have always wondered about is Lester Young. Well, not *always* - since I read the liner notes on the Ken Burns CD, which say he used "homosexual slang," or something like that, and "called everybody lady," but was not, *not*, NOT gay. I have no idea, myself. I looked for a biography after I read that, but couldn't find one at the time (several years ago). He's one of my favorite musicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Show this over in GD
All of us should be aware of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent point.
Edited on Fri Oct-16-09 07:25 PM by David Zephyr
But then Europeans made Jesus a white man.

Male patriarchs created "gods" in their own image.

And yes, gay people with historically noteworthy contributions are marginalized by being reported as heterosexual.

I have a late uncle who everyone in my family knows was gay. And yet, they always are quick to mention that he was "married" to his "wife"....Yeah, his "wife" of one year in his seventy-plus years. He died in a car wreck at Portuguese Bend on the Palos Verdes peninsula here in Los Angeles in the 1960's leaving a gay bar in San Pedro. And he was my favorite uncle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. At the same time, there are some famous gay people who desire not to be identified as gay.
Edited on Mon Oct-19-09 09:59 AM by closeupready
Because they "don't like labels." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. great story, and an old one too
History is full of Great Gays that "we" don't read about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. This DU thread last week on Eleanor Roosevelt's birthday:
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 07:21 AM by Smarmie Doofus
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6751015

On National Coming Out Day, yet.

On the National Equality March day, yet.


Not even a mention. They say they "love" her .... but it seems they really love their *idea* of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. They did the same thing to Arthur C. Clarke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. It does happen all the time. An observation I made last night related to this kind of filter
the media has, I was watching 60 Minutes about the cancer guy, and suddenly, behind him, is this blonde woman, and I thought to myself, obviously, that's his wife, but upon reflection, I was like, who is this woman, and why am I supposed to presume that they are married, and if he was married to a man (haha), they would have found a way to whitewash his husband out of the camera.

On edit, I hadn't read the other responses yet, but doing so just now, I see that others have made the same point. Makes me angry to think that only WE seem to notice - heterosexuals tell us we are being 'too sensitive'. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Omissions are one thing
If I had to pick an obituary for myself, it would mention my family and survivors, and my accomplishments, not a paean to my gayness.

I'm an American first, and expecting obituaries to mention all the gay factors in our lives is like expecting an obit to mention all the "straight" factors in someone else's life. It's not realistic, or representative.

Tell them I lived in a thoroughly illegal yet valid marriage with three husbands, a wife, and with occasional guests, and let them draw their own conclusions.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick -- fascinating read. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC