|
...I think something that needs to be emphasized a lot more (and explained, since there's so much confusion about it) is that being transgendered is an entirely different issue from being gay or lesbian.
Wait, wait! Hear me out! It's not what it sounds like! LOL
I readily accept the idea of lesbian MTFs, gay FTMs, and bi MTFs and FTMs. AFAIC, if you're lesbian, gay, or bi, you're part of the LGB community. If you're lesbian, gay, or bi, and transgendered, you're part of the LGBT community. No questions asked, nobody's genitals examined at the door.
What's difficult for me to deal with are straight MTFs and MTFs -- they're not lesbian, gay, or bi (and, barring the grace of God/dess, they never will be). I wish them well, and hope they find the MOTOS of their dreams, but it's a big stretch for me to include being transgendered alone (and not L, G, or B) as part of the LGBT community. They're straight -- and while they face the same brand of persecution any L/G/B trans does, they want (as far as I can tell) to integrate into straight society, not gay society.
I wish I could think of a better example, but let's use one we all know: Brandon Teena. Brandon was not a lesbian. Brandon, as far as Brandon was concerned, was a straight man. Brandon (as I recall) was grossed out by lesbianism, and wasn't too keen on being around gay men, either.
Of course, not all straight TG's are homophobes -- but they're not homos, either.
So for this lesbian, I embrace lesbian MTFs as part of the lesbian community as much as I would if they'd been born with all the plumbing I was -- and by extension, gay FTMs as part of the gay community.
Where I draw the line is embracing straight TGs as part of the LGBT community simply by default. (In the same vein, I've known countless straight male X-dressers who hung out at lesbian bars just because there was nowhere else they could go in a dress and not get beaten up. No problem -- but they were never, ever gay.) I'll support them, I'll cheer them on, I'll push for their right to be who they are and live as they should, and I'll be their friend -- but beyond that, they're part of "gay society" only in the way any other straight ally is part of "gay society." In other words, no matter how much I love our straight allies, they're of another world -- the straight world.
And then there's the question of intersexed people. Are they queer? OK, then they're L/G/B+I. If they're straight, then they're not.
I know, I know -- we're all victims of persecution for the same basic reason: sex, sex, sex. And I'm not trying to draw lines in the sand out of some phobia about whether or not somebody has a penis, a vagina, both, or neither. And I acknowledge all persecution by the non-queer world as equally important, and I'm more than willing to stand up for the rights of people with whom I have nothing in common (i.e., straight TGs and straight intersexed people).
But: To me, working alongside straight TG's and I's is the same as working for the rights of any other minority to which I don't belong. I have nothing in common with, say, repatriated Sudanese students, but if I found an opportunity to do something to make their lives better, I would. But that doesn't mean they're automatically part of my culture (not that they would want to be), nor I part of theirs.
And while I hate emphasizing differences (we're all human, we are all one, yada yada yada), we have to be realistic.
That said, I believe emphasizing the difference between gender identity and sexual orientation (better than it has been explained before) will go a long way toward diminishing transphobia in the LGB community. It's no instant cure -- but if there's one thing I know, it's that phobia = fear of the unknown, and education is the only way to clear the fog of mystery.
(Ally, I know, this is probably all TG 101 remedial stuff, but as I said, I think it's something that isn't spelled out often enough, and I feel the need to spell it out.)
Now, there's another issue about L/G/B TG's that will probably always be a sore point, on both sides. I almost hesitate to bring it up, but it's a valid point, as it makes the transphobia issue even murkier: It's one thing to fully embrace L/G/B TG's -- socially, politically, etc. -- in the LGBT community, and it's another thing altogether for a L/G/B person to decide if s/he wants to be involved romantically/sexually with a TG person. Does the TG accept the fact that there are those of us who want "native-born" genitalia like ours, without labeling us as transphobes all over again?
Did I just hear a few heads exploding?
That's another difference that needs to be discussed, openly and honestly, no matter whose feelings get hurt (mine included). And if you (or anyone) wants to get into that sticky subject, I'm game -- but everybody has to agree to do their best not to take everything so personally that it dissolves into a flame war.
If that's too touchy a subject (for now), I'll leave it alone. But someday, we all have to talk about it (and about biphobia, in the same terms).
|