Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could have told you this was coming...Federal Anti-Gay Amendment Returns In Wake Of Calif. Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:46 AM
Original message
Could have told you this was coming...Federal Anti-Gay Amendment Returns In Wake Of Calif. Ruling
(Washington) Republican Congressman Paul Broun (pictured) has announced plans to reintroduce an amendment to the US Constitution to bar same-sex marriage.

Broun (R-Ga) said the California Supreme Court ruling recognizing same-sex marriage has made it an imperative to reign in what he called "activist judges".

"My amendment will preserve the original intent of the drafters of the Constitution, by ensuring that no state or federal judge can take it upon themselves to suddenly discover a right to homosexual marriage within the text of the document," Broun said in a statement.

"It will also provide a defense against activist judges who seek to overturn the will of the people by manipulating state constitutions in order to impose their preferred policy position."

Conservatives in California already are organizing a proposed amendment to ban gay marriage but Broun said even if approved by voters in that state would not prevent similar ruling elsewhere in the country.

http://www.365gay.com/Newscon08/05/052108amend.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. another conservative jackass
Edited on Wed May-21-08 11:50 AM by bowens43
who apparently believes that the Constitution grants us rights. How ironic that he says "original intent of the drafters of the Constitution".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. It seems to me that since there is NO mention of ANY marriage in the constitution
that THAT is the original intent of the founding fathers.

Who marries who is NONE of the government's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Prepare for the onslaught of "GAYS ARE COSTING US THE ELECTION" posts.
And it will be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It won't be long
and it will go on and on and on. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Isn't it kind of our function, our purpose in life...
to take the blame on DU for the Democrats' incompetence, hypocrisy, and general inability to organize so much as a kegger in a brewery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. FUCK NO!
It does seem so but FUCK NO! :hi: Tyo. I just responded to you in the Skinner thread. You say a lot of great things here and I have always appreciated you and your thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans are just Nazis who are too lazy to march. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. That would be REPUBLICAN appointed activist judges.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:10 PM by 94114_San_Francisco
Wonder why he left that out? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Because the judge that wrote the decision is a Saint Ronnie appointee.
No speaking ill of Saint Ronnie, even by implication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you, Hillary Clinton's husband, for signing the Defense of Marriage Act.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 12:53 PM by closeupready
Making it thus, the Triumph of the Wi... er. the Will of the People. :hi: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great. I wonder if Sen. Byrd will make another impassioned speech to support the FMA again
After so many have praised him here for his turnaround on (racist) bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Of course. We should rename the amendment the "2000,2004,
2008 Wedge Issue Amendment" because it is trotted out about six months prior to each Presidential Election for the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC