Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colds 'may trigger child cancers'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 08:47 PM
Original message
Colds 'may trigger child cancers'
12 December 2005

Scientists have found further compelling evidence infections such as colds may trigger childhood cancers.

The University of Newcastle-led team looked at 3,000 childhood cancers in 0 to 14-year-olds from 1954 to 1998, the European Journal of Cancer reported.

Researchers found unusual clusters of brain tumours and leukaemia which were typical of infection-related disease.

But children would need genetic factors to make them susceptible, they added. Experts said more evidence was needed.

The team found a pattern emerged where by the types of cancer repeatedly occurred at similar times and geographical locations, known as "space-time clustering".

Disease caused by more constant environmental factors produce clusters of cases in one place over a much longer period of time.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4521024.stm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did children die of Cancer in these numbers thirty-to-fifty years ago?
Has there been a rise, or is it the same?

We did have colds back then, too.

Perhaps it's lower immunity that sets a body up for what actually "triggers" Cancer.

Colds trigger cancer? What an odd way to put it. But then, no one would be responsible for causing cancer, it would just be "natures way." Another nice theory to drag into a courtroom when a variety of industries get sued.

I'm very suspicious of articles like that one. Please, someone with knowledge about such things and not employed by Dow, knock some sense into me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They died of the primary infection
or strep or diarrhea and didn't live to get the later cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Penicillin has been around for sixty + years and sulfa, I think for a bit
Edited on Mon Dec-12-05 10:12 PM by Kurovski
longer.

So that wouldn't fit into the theory because infections that may have grown from a cold were treatable then.

If you're talking diarrhea aren't you speaking of the flu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't be at all surprised...
.. because IMHO, way, way, way more maladies that afflict the human body are tied to malfunction of the immune system than is currently acknowledged. I say this not as a doctor, but as an average dumbass who reads :)

I can well imagine the "after effects" of the revving up of the immune system to play a role. Weakened by fighting a virus. Overhyped and attacking the wrong things.

Many also think that type I diabetes (juvenile) is generally triggered by a viral illness. Of course, if you have the genetics, it is only a matter of timing as to when you get triggered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe it's the toxic cold medicines that cause the cancer and not the cold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. hehe. actually, pointlessly giving penicillin for a cold could
affect the immune system adversly.

But that neon-green, red and purple stuff--yeesh.

Some cold remedies would also suppress the immune system. that's how allergy medication works, isn't it? Suppressing the immune response?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think all anti-histamines, by definition, suppress immune response.
It's a very specific immune response that they key on, and not the entire immune system, but it still is a natural defense that is being countered by them in the interest of treating the symptoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC