Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. medical tourists to Mexico with prostate cancer increasing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:19 AM
Original message
U.S. medical tourists to Mexico with prostate cancer increasing
Despite Doubts, Cancer Therapy Draws Patients

PUERTO VALLARTA, Mexico — Some weekends, more than a dozen American men wait at beachfront hotels, anxious for their turns in the treatment room at a small private hospital here.

They are medical tourists with prostate cancer. And they are queued up for the latest therapy — one advertised with pictures of couples strolling on the beach and pitched as a way to treat the patients’ disease while preserving their sex lives.

The treatment is called high-intensity focused ultrasound, or HIFU (pronounced HIGH-foo). And instead of using surgery or radiation, it attacks the cancerous tissue by heating the prostate to temperatures near boiling.

Tropical beaches aside, there is a reason that hundreds of American men have traveled out of the country to receive HIFU. It is not approved in the United States. And its growing popularity has some cancer experts voicing caution. They argue that there is not yet enough evidence that the treatment stops cancer over the long run and they say the side effects are not as minimal as described by US HIFU, the company sponsoring the offshore treatment weekends.

The company is attracting attention for its aggressive recruitment of American doctors who will go through training and perform the treatments. The company charges patients $25,000 to $30,000, a fee that is usually not reimbursed by insurance. Of that, the company pays the doctors $5,000 to $7,500 — several times what physicians earn for conventional prostate cancer procedures in the United States.

NY Times


I learned about the brisk medical tourism business in the 90s, as our medical system worsen the tourism seem to be increasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is So Wrong
Totally unproven - could make things worse for all anyone knows.

(For that matter, removal of a cancerous prostate in men older than 65 seems to not change outcome, so there's plenty of fraud in US medicine as well.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is sad. It speaks to the perception of the American cancer 'industry'
failure to respond to needs here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm Not Sure That It Says This
These folks are going abroad for an unproven treatment. In the medical world, most unproven treatments, when tested, turn out to be of no use - and often worse than doing nothing. People who travel abroad for unproved treatments are ill-advised.

The US medical establishment has many, many faults - but, in this particular case, I don't think they're guilty.

(If you want to talk about 50,000 Americans killed by Vioxx, that's another story...)

Al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Many of the earliest patients of this procedure were physicians
which should assist determining whether it is indeed proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That Really Wouldn't Mean Anything
Surprising but true - I work in the medical-industrial complex, with many of the world's top docs (particularly in the Harvard Med School system). I feel *very* confident in saying that a doctor believing in something is no proof of its safety and/or efficacy.

Scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is scary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC