Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

False Positives Common on Cancer Tests, Scientists Find

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:23 AM
Original message
False Positives Common on Cancer Tests, Scientists Find

By Elizabeth Lopatto

May 11 (Bloomberg) -- A third of men and a quarter of women undergoing cancer screening will get false positive results by the time they have undergone four tests, which can lead to inappropriate medical procedures, a study found.

Men’s risk of a false-positive finding was 36.7 percent by the fourth screening, and women’s risk of the wrong result was 26.2 percent by the fourth of the 14 routinely recommended tests possible for each patient, according to the research published in Annals of Family Medicine. Almost 1 in 5 men and 1 in 10 women were likely to undergo an invasive diagnostic procedure such as a biopsy due to a false positive after four tests.

Many cancer screening tests are recommended to the public, as some doctors say that the earlier a malignancy is diagnosed, the easier it is to treat. The American Cancer Society recommends colon cancer screens for men and women ages 50 and older.

“Messages about screening have been oversimplified to ‘Early detection saves lives,’ and that’s the end, and people are made to feel irresponsible if they don’t test,” said Jennifer Croswell, the study’s lead author and acting director of the office of medical applications of research at the Bethesda-based National Institutes of Health, in a telephone interview today. “It’s a more nuanced decision than that. The more times you intervene, the greater the chance is you’re going to have harm.”

Reducing Cancer Deaths

Continued>>>
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=areU4ct5H4F0&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is no big secret. it has been a part of any discussion that i have ever
heard when a new screening tool becomes available. :shrug: nothing is without risk. a biopsy is not like amputating a limb or anything. people should pull their socks up, and grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vorlund Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is not surprising at all if you look at some numbers
Let's say that a screening procedure is 99% accurate in diagnosing the presence or absence of a cancer. Now let's suppose that 1 out of 1000 people screened for that cancer do in fact have it. Now for the math:

99% of the true positives will register as positives (0.99 positives per 1000)

1% of the true negatives will register as positives (9.99 positives per 1000)

So out of 1000 people screened, about 11 will test positive, but only one of those will actually have the cancer (approximately)

This means that about 9% of all positives will be true positives- the rest will be false positives. These aren't the true numbers- just ones I used because the algebra was easy to do in my head- but a little research can turn up more accurate numbers and you can do the calculations to get the ratio of true positives to false positives.

The point is that any time you are using a test to determine the presence or absence of a condition that has a relatively low frequency in the tested population, even with highly accurate tests a high percentage of all positives will be false positives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. K
and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC