Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key to long life may be mom's age at birth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 09:26 AM
Original message
Key to long life may be mom's age at birth
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-06-23T213904Z_01_SPI377899_RTRUKOC_0_US-SCIENCE-BIRTH-AGE.xml

The age at which a mother gives birth has a major impact on how long her child will live, two researchers from the University of Chicago's Center on Aging told the Chicago Actuarial Association meeting this spring.

The chances of living to the ripe old age of 100 -- and beyond -- nearly double for a child born to a woman before her 25th birthday, Drs. Leonid Gavrilov and Natalia Gavrilova reported. The father's age is less important to longevity, according to their research.

In a previous study, the husband and wife research team of Gavrilov and Gavrilova identified birth order as a possible predictor of an exceptionally long life. They observed that first-born children, especially daughters, are much more likely to live to age 100.

But their latest research suggests that it is the young age of the mother, rather than birth order, which is significant to longevity.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. First they conclude it's birth order? Then they conclude it's age of mom?
It seems they're trying to make their research fit their hypothesis.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey folks, read this gem from the article....
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 09:38 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
The finding that children born to young women are more likely to live to 100 "may have important social implications," Gavrilov added in a statement, "because many women postpone their childbearing to later ages because of career demands."


Lazy research to reach a judgemental conclusion. MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or is it "research" used to suport a forgone conclusion?
Of course most of the people who have lived to 100 had mothers that were in their early 20's. That was in 1906. Most women (those who didn't die in child birth) had their children young and the life span was much shorter.

Of course, back then, it was considered correct to keep 'em barefoot and pregnant. Good thing we're past that type of thinking now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. American diets were grossly different back then compared to now
We are essentially feeding our children garbage these days. Don't expect any long term payoffs from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It should save social security $$
Maybe this should be added to the models that show we will run out of social security money. Pretty good argument against "needing" to privatize!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL, excellent! n/t
:hi: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Im screwed
My mom was 39 when she had me. :shrug:

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Funny, they found that lengthening telomeres in lab animal offspring
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 11:04 AM by Warpy
thus increasing lifespan, was linked to delaying the first pregnancy to the second or third oestrus, not the first.

My own family tended to run to late marriage and late childbearing, and living into the late 80s to the late 90s was the norm for both my grandparents' and parents' generations.

I think considerably more study needs to be done on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm doomed
My mother was 36 and I'm the youngest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cabbage eating & tea! Fish too. Check out the Nova Scotia Cluster
that goes as far as Boston with descendants who live to be past 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. My poor little guy!!!
I'm 37 and had a baby in January. I guess he's doomed. Selfish me for putting it off. His brother was born when I was 26, though, so maybe one of my kids will survive to be a burden on society. A mom can dream... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. My mom was age zero at birth
Where does that leave me?

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL
You'll live forever, obviously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh, crap! I don't have that kind of time (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC