Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Major insurers to drop child policies ahead of coverage mandate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:19 AM
Original message
Major insurers to drop child policies ahead of coverage mandate
Never fault the major health insurers for lack of imagination. They continue to game the system.




Just days away from the implementation of new rules that will prevent insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions, numerous major insurers have opted to end the sale of child-only policies.

Anthem Blue Cross and associate WellPoint, Aetna Inc., Cigna Inc., CoventryOne and others have been making under-the-radar announcements about their child health offerings in recent days, drawing sharp criticism from Democrats and progressive activists who championed the president's health care reform agenda.

Insurers say the government's mandate to extend coverage to children with pre-existing conditions could endanger their obligations to other policy holders -- essentially blaming the Obama administration for their actions.

Child-only policies that have already been issued will still be honored, they claim. Citizens in states that mandate child-only policies be offered, such as Maine and New York, will retain an option to purchase the plans.

Health insurers had argued that the mandate against pre-existing condition denials would allow parents to buy insurance only after their children get sick and not before. Because of their objection, the Obama administration added a provision in the health reform legislation that allows policy issuers to establish limited enrollment periods and other restrictions.



Major insurers to drop child policies ahead of coverage mandate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are now ineligible for the exchange.
Wonder what their investors think about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uh oh
I see (another) strongly worded letter heading their way.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently The legislation allows for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. another example of letting the fox design the henhouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is EXACTLY as predicted by me and others here at DU BEFORE HCR passed
Edited on Wed Sep-22-10 12:01 PM by Vinnie From Indy
Anyone that believed that the health insurers would EVER implement the HCR provisions fairly is either a moron or willfully ignorant beyond hope.


As sure as the Sun rises in the East, these health insurers have plans in place to evade and subvert most every provision of the HCR legislation. The sad thing is that they have had these plans since before the legislation was passed. It was all worked in secret meetings and backroom deals. It was all theater. Everything from Obama publicly pushing for a public option he KNEW would never be in the bill to recruiting Joe Lieberman to be the villian near the end to deflect blame, the HCR legislation was a con game. People will still be dying by the tens of thousands because they cannot get treated properly and insurance executives and rich investors will still be able to trade lives for truckloads of cash.
Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. ahhh the loopholes..written into the bill by the Insurance Corporations
ohhh Happy Happy Joy Joy..and what did many of us warn about , who were slammed by a certain minority here, and say before this bill was written and delivered by the Insurance big boys????????

OH WTF did we know ????????? right?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand
what parents have to buy child only policies? Why aren't they included on their policies? If they are poor and have no insurance themselves and need it for the kids, wouldn't Medicaid apply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC