Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:20 PM
Original message
Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect
WASHINGTON — A former Army microbiologist who worked for years with Bruce E. Ivins, whom the F.B.I. has blamed for the anthrax letter attacks that killed five people in 2001, told a National Academy of Sciences panel on Thursday that he believed it was impossible that the deadly spores had been produced undetected in Dr. Ivins’s laboratory, as the F.B.I. asserts.

Asked by reporters after his testimony whether he believed that there was any chance that Dr. Ivins, who committed suicide in 2008, had carried out the attacks, the microbiologist, Henry S. Heine, replied, “Absolutely not.” At the Army’s biodefense laboratory in Maryland, where Dr. Ivins and Dr. Heine worked, he said, “among the senior scientists, no one believes it.”

Dr. Heine told the 16-member panel, which is reviewing the F.B.I.’s scientific work on the investigation, that producing the quantity of spores in the letters would have taken at least a year of intensive work using the equipment at the army lab. Such an effort would not have escaped colleagues’ notice, he added later, and lab technicians who worked closely with Dr. Ivins have told him they saw no such work.

He told the panel that biological containment measures where Dr. Ivins worked were inadequate to prevent the spores from floating out of the laboratory into animal cages and offices. “You’d have had dead animals or dead people,” he said.

Refresh | +9 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, a SCAPEGOAT is
a very valuable commodity.

And Ivins at least provided that.
Deadmen cannot protest accusations against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But his colleagues can and are doing so. I'm glad they're standing up for his integrity. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I am not sure that unrequested heresay from second parties
is going to matter one iota to an FBI that has decided to close the case.

No one REALLY wants an answer other than the one in the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dec 2001: Bush Stops Investigation of Boston FBI
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sept 2001: White House takes Cipro (anti-Anthrax med) PRIOR to 9/11: Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sept 11 2001: Evening: Cheney given Cipro, weeks before Anthrax Attacks
White House Mail Machine Has Anthrax
By Sandra Sobieraj
Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2001; 8:11 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON –– President Bush said confidently Tuesday that "I don't have anthrax" after biohazard testing at the White House and the discovery of anthrax on a mail-opening machine at a screening facility six miles away.

All White House mail – more than 40,000 letters a week – is examined at military facilities across the Potomac River.

"Let me put it this way," Bush said. "I'm confident that when I come to work tomorrow, I'll be safe."

Asked if he was tested for the germ that has killed three people already this month, or if he was taking precautionary antibiotics, Bush replied simply: "I don't have anthrax."

At least some White House personnel were given Cipro six weeks ago. White House officials won't discuss who might be receiving the anthrax-treating antibiotic now.

On the night of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House Medical Office dispensed Cipro to staff accompanying Vice President Dick Cheney as he was secreted off to the safety of Camp David, and told them it was "a precaution," according to one person directly involved.

http://www.webcitation.org/5jpoTH18h
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC