Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Birds: the sordid truth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:23 PM
Original message
Birds: the sordid truth
Scientically-minded readers will, of course, be familiar with the seminal paper by C. W. Moeliker of Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, "The first case of homosexual necrophilia in the mallard Anas platyrhynchos (Aves: Anatidae)" (http://www.nmr.nl/deins815.htm). It won the 2003 Ig Nobel in the biology category. Well, it seems that it's not only ducks which get up to this sort of stuff. Read this heart-warming tale of two swallows:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=246277

Summary: a photographer witnesses a swallow apparently trying to "help" his dead "friend". He writes a cloying, mawkish commentary on the photos. A biology professor concisely describes, with the benefit of experience, what he believes is really going on. The posters who want to believe in the Disneyfied version react with outraged denial. It's all rather... well, just read the comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pretty funny reactions
Especially the one that dismisses the bird expert with, "I just say that art is different than science you can read a book or count the pages .. it is another approach"

Almost like saying that if you jump off a cliff and enjoy the experience as an artist, you won't go splat at the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...LOL...
I read the story and was some what moved, and thought 'How sad'... then I read what was actually happening in the pictures and laughed my ass off. I went back and looked at the pictures and laughed even harder.

I guess this goes to show how easily people can be manipulated into seeing something that isn't there in an image with a little narration. You see what you want to see, I suppose. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emperor_Norton_II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Disney view of wildlife: 0 - Reality: 1
pwned! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's all a question of the swallow's load
Did they really think a swallow could carry another one? ...

SOLDIER #1:
    What? A swallow carrying a coconut?
ARTHUR:
    It could grip it by the husk!
SOLDIER #1:
    It's not a question of where he grips it! It's a simple
question of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a
one pound coconut.
ARTHUR:
    Well, it doesn't matter. Will you go and tell your master
that Arthur from the Court of Camelot is here?
SOLDIER #1:
    Listen. In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow
needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second, right?
ARTHUR:
    Please!
SOLDIER #1:
    Am I right?
ARTHUR:
    I'm not interested!
SOLDIER #2:
    It could be carried by an African swallow!
SOLDIER #1:
    Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European
swallow. That's my point.
SOLDIER #2:
    Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
ARTHUR:
    Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court at
Camelot?!
SOLDIER #1:
    But then of course a-- African swallows are non-migratory.
SOLDIER #2:
    Oh, yeah.
SOLDIER #1:
    So, they couldn't bring a coconut back anyway.
    [clop clop clop]
SOLDIER #2:
    Wait a minute! Supposing two swallows carried it together?
SOLDIER #1:
    No, they'd have to have it on a line.
SOLDIER #2:
    Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!
SOLDIER #1:
    What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
SOLDIER #2:
    Well, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, it's dead. So it can't swallow.
:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC