Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here They Are, Science's 10 Most Beautiful Experiments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 09:12 AM
Original message
Here They Are, Science's 10 Most Beautiful Experiments
By GEORGE JOHNSON
Published: September 24, 2002
Whether they are blasting apart subatomic particles in accelerators, sequencing the genome or analyzing the wobble of a distant star, the experiments that grab the world's attention often cost millions of dollars to execute and produce torrents of data to be processed over months by supercomputers. Some research groups have grown to the size of small companies.

But ultimately science comes down to the individual mind grappling with something mysterious. When Robert P. Crease, a member of the philosophy department at the State University of New York at Stony Brook and the historian at Brookhaven National Laboratory, recently asked physicists to nominate the most beautiful experiment of all time, the 10 winners were largely solo performances, involving at most a few assistants. Most of the experiments -- which are listed in this month's Physics World -- took place on tabletops and none required more computational power than that of a slide rule or calculator.

What they have in common is that they epitomize the elusive quality scientists call beauty. This is beauty in the classical sense: the logical simplicity of the apparatus, like the logical simplicity of the analysis, seems as inevitable and pure as the lines of a Greek monument. Confusion and ambiguity are momentarily swept aside, and something new about nature becomes clear.

The list in Physics World was ranked according to popularity, first place going to an experiment that vividly demonstrated the quantum nature of the physical world. But science is a cumulative enterprise -- that is part of its beauty. Rearranged chronologically and annotated below, the winners provide a bird's-eye view of more than 2,000 years of discovery.

more:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D06E6D91439F937A1575AC0A9649C8B63
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. that's a pretty amazing list....
The sheer elegance of inferring the earth's circumference from measurements of cast shadows at noon, or demonstrating planetary rotation with a suspended weight is absolutely amazing. Those are all great choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. It should be titled "Physics' 10 most Beautiful Experiments"
Chemistry and Biology have their own Beautiful Experiments.

If we were to pick the 30 most Beautiful Science Experiments I suspect Physics, Chemistry, and Biology would have close to equal representation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm reading this book now.
It isn't just physics. The chapter on Lavoisier was fabulous and included a discussion about the work of Priestly and Scheele among others. This book is really about the foundation of science. I'm loving it!

He was great on Colbert a few months ago. Here's the link to the video:

http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/videos.jhtml?videoId=167602

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Idiocy. It has false shit in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And the "false shit" is? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC