Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quebec Rocks May Be Oldest on Earth, Scientists Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 06:56 AM
Original message
Quebec Rocks May Be Oldest on Earth, Scientists Say

By KENNETH CHANG
Published: September 25, 2008

A swath of bedrock in northern Quebec may be the oldest known piece of the earth’s crust.

Researchers report that this rock is 4.28 billion years old and formed when the Earth was less than 300 million years old.
In an article appearing in Friday’s issue of the journal Science, scientists report that portions of that bedrock are 4.28 billion years old, formed when the earth was less than 300 million years old.

“These rocks paint this picture of an early earth that looked pretty much like the modern earth,” said Richard W. Carlson of the Carnegie Institution of Washington and one of the authors of the paper.

Other scientists are intrigued, but not yet entirely convinced that the rocks are quite that old.

“There is a certain amount of healthy skepticism that needs to play a role here,” said Stephen J. Mojzsis, a professor of geological sciences at the University of Colorado. Dr. Mojzsis said the new research was well done, but that he thought these were younger sedimentary rocks, pressed together out of the remnants of earlier rocks that were indeed 4.28 billion years old.

more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/science/26rock.html?ex=1380081600&en=df6a3b5b6f0c2342&ei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=digg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe that 4.28 billion years makes them just slightly younger than the moon
But it seems close enough to 4.5 billion years (most recent estimate of the moon's age that I've seen) that they might be about the same age.

If the collision theory origin of the moon is true, I've always wondered if there was any chance of solid rocks surviving from 'Earth Mark I' (or from whatever hit it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I highly doubt any pre-impact rocks survived.
The impact would of turned the surface into a sea of lava several hundred miles thick. The surface seems to have had solidified extremely quickly, though; there are 4.4 billion year old crystals of zircon (the hard, clear crystals used as fake diamonds) found in Australia that give chemical evidence of there being large bodies liquid water on Earth 4.4 billion years ago, just 100 million years after the great impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I bet McCain could shed some light on them
provide a first-person account and all that... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! that's almost 300 million years older then the previous record!
The 4 billion year-old Actasca Formation in the NW Territories. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC