Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Same-sex relationships may play an important role in evolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:01 PM
Original message
Same-sex relationships may play an important role in evolution
Birds do it. Bees probably do it. No one's sure whether educated fleas do it. What they do is have same-sex relationships and, in a new review of published research on the subject, biologists have started to consider what it might mean for the evolution of the animals in question.

Nathan Bailey and Marlene Zuk, biologists at the University of California, Riverside, found that same-sex relationships were a universal phenomenon in the animal kingdom, seen in everything from worms to frogs to birds. "It's clear that same-sex sexual behavior extends far beyond the well-known examples that dominate both the scientific and popular literature: for example bonobos, dolphins, penguins and fruit flies," said Bailey.


....

Bailey and Zuk are also researching the Laysan albatross, a species in which females form same-sex pairs and rear young together. "Same-sex behavior in this species may not be aberrant, but instead can arise as an alternative reproductive strategy," they said.

Almost a third of Laysan albatross couples are female-female pairs and they are more successful than unpaired females when it comes to rearing chicks.

"Same-sex sexual behaviors are flexibly deployed in a variety of circumstances, for example as alternative reproductive tactics, as cooperative breeding strategies, as facilitators of social bonding or as mediators of intrasexual conflict. Once this flexibility is established, it becomes in and of itself a selective force that can drive selection on other aspects of physiology, life history, social behaviour and even morphology," said Bailey.



http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/jun/17/same-sex-relationships-gay-animals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been saying it for years, and you don't have to look to lesser species to prove it.
Heterosexuals often raise children in homosexual couples. But going with the theme:

Jake and Mary have a farm. Jake has a gay brother. So Jake Farm has two men working the fields instead of one. Surely that increases the likelihood of success for Jake Farm. Jake's gay brother finds a lover. Now you have three men working the fields and one woman bearing children. Because there are three men working the fields, Jake Farm can afford to hire a woman to help Mary, including to allow her to take it easy during pregnancy, increasing the likelihood of Mary and the baby surviving. A "traditional family" is at a decided disadvantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's very possible
That having same-sex pairs makes it more likely to form a community for mutual labor and protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I thought about it when watching a show about gorillas
Gorilla tribes have an alpha breeding pair. Unmated females help with the nursery. I don't know what unmated males do, but frankly in some of these animal cultures and some primitive human cultures males don't appear to do a whole lot for the tribe, and whatever they do for the tribe tends to be a byproduct of their own interests. Kind of like a lion, "Yeah, I killed a gazelle and when I"m done with it you kids can have the rest."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've always thought it was nature's way of controlling over
population...notice the ratio of males being born to females too...female births have increased in species across the board while males births are down. Nature has everything pretty well planned to care for itself and I think the earth is feeling the weight of too many humans trodding on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. wouldn't more female births increase populations? one male can
still impregnate many females over just a short time while the females can't give birth again for some amount of gestation and recovery time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not if the majority left were gay
or even just a third...physically they could still mate, but wouldn't have the attraction to do it...no instinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I've wondered that as well
you'd not be able to really figure it out because you'd never get firm numbers of homosexuals in a population for more than the most recent time periods, but it would be interesting to see if the ratio changed as population pressures changed in a given society, whether human or animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC